Laserfiche WebLink
n•w1y ) Y <br />' 04 February 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 98-0534 <br />' Page 2 of 3 <br />' 2 2 COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> ti <br /> After the depth to ground water was measured to ensure that a minimum of 80% well-volume ' <br />' recharge had been achieved, a'water sample was collected from each well using a dedicated and <br /> disposable plastic bailer Immediately upon retrieval,samples were transferred Into one-liter amber <br /> bottles and three 40-m1 EPA-approved volatile organic analysis(VOA)vials containing 0 5 ml 18% <br /> hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative The samples were logged on a chain-of-custody form, <br /> stored in a chilled container under ice The samples were later transported under chain-of-custody <br /> to Cal Tech Environmental Laboratory(CTEL), State of California Department of Health Services <br />' (DHS)-certified analytical laboratory# 2424 for analysis The samples were analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) and diesel (TPH-d) in <br />' accordance with EPA Method 8015 Modified, <br /> • Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) and methyl tertiary-butyl ether <br />' (MTBE) in accordance with EPA Method 8021, and <br /> • Oxygenated compounds - di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE), <br /> MTBE,tertiary-amyl methyl ether(TAME),tertiary butanol(TBA),ethanol,methanol, 1,2- <br /> dibromoethane (EDB) and 1,2-dichloroethane(1,2-DCA) in accordance with EPA Method <br /> 8260-Modified <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br />' Ground water elevation, flow direction and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br />' 31 October 2003, the contaminant impact to ground water was assessed from the laboratory data <br />' 3 1 GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> The relative elevation of ground water in each well was calculated by subtracting the depth to ground <br />' water from the relative casing elevation(Table 1) The average depth to ground water on 31 October <br /> was 12 5 feet below the tops of the well casings,presently the water table is at the top of the screened <br /> interval of the wells Ground water was inferred to be flowing towards the south west across the <br /> former UST area to 0 002 (see Figure 3) The ground water elevation of monitoring well MW-4 <br /> appeared anomalously low,out of the range of the surrounding wells by 1 foot,and therefore the data <br /> from that well was not used to map the ground water elevation <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />