Laserfiche WebLink
' 08 August 2005 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 98-0534 " <br /> , <br />' Page 14 of 15 <br /> investigation of the former UST area,yields 318 yards of impacted soil with a volume of 2 3 gallons <br />' of petroleum (TPH) In the remaining impacted soil at the site (Appendix F) <br /> The estimated distribution of dissolved MTBE concentrations is depicted in plan view in Figure 8 -' <br />' The dissolved volume-mass calculation using the data collected from the most recent ground water <br /> monitoring event demonstrates that a mass of 0 14 kilograms or 0,3'lbs of dissolved MTBE remains <br /> near the former UST area(Appendix G) r►l-"' b G <br />' 6.0. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based on data collected during site assessment and ground water monitoring events,AGE concludes <br /> I • In August 2000, the gradient in the area of the former USTs was calculated to be 0 003'ft/ft <br /> in southwest flow direction, in December 2000,the gradient was calculated to be 0 003 ft/:ft' <br />' in a south-southeast to southwest flow direction, in May 2001, the gradient was calculated <br /> to be 0 007 ft/ft' in a south-southeast to southwest flow direction, in January 2002, the <br /> gradient was calculated to be 0 009 to 0 01 ft/ft in a northernly flow direction, in June 2002, <br /> • the gradient was calculated to be 0 009 to 0 01 ft/ft In a northeastern flow direction, in <br /> October 2002,the gradient was calculated to be nearly flat,in January 2003,the gradient was <br /> calculated to be 0 0063 ft/ft in a northeast flow direction and 0 0052 ft/ft in a southwest flow <br /> direction, in October 2003, the gradient was calculated to be 0 002 ft/ft in a southwestern <br /> flow direction and in February 2004, the gradient was calculated to be 0 02 ft/ft in a <br /> northwest flow direction The final ground water monitoring event demonstrated a northern <br /> ground water flow direction at a gradient of 0 017 ft/ft The flow direction at the site has been <br /> ranged from north-northwest to south-southwest during this investigation <br />' Concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons have decreased in MW-1 through MW-8 to <br /> non-detectable concentrations between the August 2000 and February 2004, since then <br /> ground water monitoring events, initial elevated petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in <br />' ground water encountered during tank removal and soil boring activities were not detected <br /> u in quarterly ground water monitoring samples Monitoring well MW-9,screened from 60 feet <br /> to 65 feet bsg at the former UST release area was non detect for hydrocarbons and fuel <br /> additives for three consecutive monitoring events The lack of high concentrations during <br /> quarterly monitoring indicates the initial elevated concentrations were due to minor releases <br />' of petroleum hydrocarbons as a result of contractor error, product spillage, during tank <br /> removal Field notes from the geologist on site during removal activities indicate product <br /> spilling from UST during removal The dissolved hydrocarbon plume appears to be well- <br /> defined, low in concentration and stable The dissolved MTBE has been laterally defined at <br /> concentrations near water quality objectives and are limited to within the boundaries of the <br /> • site Table 4 summarizes analytical results for all ground water samples collected at the site <br /> 1 Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />