Laserfiche WebLink
' 08 August 2005 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 98-0534 ` <br />' Page 8of15 <br />' and 5 3 µg11, respectively ETBE was detected by EPA Method 8260 in the samples from <br /> well MW-6 at 4 2 µg/1 TBA was detected by EPA Method 8260 in the samples from well <br /> MW-4 at 21 gg/1 No other fuel oxygenates were detected in any of the samples Ground <br />' water elevations are summarized in Table 3, analytical results of ground water samples are <br /> summarized in Table 4 Results of the June 2002 ground water monitoring event were <br /> reported in Quarterly Report-2nd Quarter 2002, dated 03 August 2002,prepared by AGE <br /> • 02 October 2002-ground water levels were measured at MW-1 and MW-3 through MW-8 <br /> Ground water monitoring well MW-2 was not readily accessible or located during the <br />' sampling event Ground water levels ranged from 1191 to 13 46 feet below the tops of the <br /> well casings (top of the screened interval), ground water flow direction at the site was <br /> inferred to be relatively flat in the area of the former USTs, trending towards a steeper <br />' northwest-oriented depression at the northern portion of the site, in the area of well MW-4 <br /> The gradient ranged from essentially flat at the former UST area to 0 04 ft/ft at the northern <br /> edge of the site TPH-d was detected in the ground water samples collected from wells <br />' MW-4, MW-6 and MW-7 at concentrations of 140 gg/l, 130 gg/l and 60 gg/l, respectively <br /> TPH-g and BTEX compounds were not detected in the ground water samples analyzed <br /> MTBE was detected by EPA Method 8260 in the samples from wells MW-3,MW-4,MW-6, <br />' . MW-7 and MW-8 at concentrations of 10 µg/l, 16 µg/l, 140 gg/l, 0 77 µg/1 and 1 2 pg/l, <br /> respectively TBA was detected in sample MW-4 at 16 µg/1 <br /> No other fuel oxygenates were detected in the samples analyzed Ground water elevations <br /> are summarized in Table 3, analytical results of ground water samples are summarized in <br /> Table 4 Results of the October 2002 ground water monitoring event were reported in <br />' Quarterly Report- 4th Quarter 2002, dated 02 December 2002, prepared by AGE <br /> • 23 January 2003 -ground water levels were measured at MW-1 and MW-3 through MW-8 <br />' Ground water monitoring well MW-2 was not readily accessible during the sampling event <br /> Ground water levels averaged 8 5 feet below the tops of the well casings(above the screened <br /> interval) Aground water ridge was present in the area of the former USTs with groundwater <br />' flowing towards the northeast away from the former UST area, with a gradient of <br /> approximately 0 0063 ft/ft and towards the southwest away from the former UST area to <br /> 0 0052 ft/ft The ground water elevation of monitoring wells MW-4 and MW-5 appeared <br />' anomalously low and further the wells failed to recharge after purging, therefore the data <br /> from these wells was not used to map the ground water elevation TPH-d was not detected <br /> in the any of the,ground water samples TPH-g was detected in the ground water samples <br />' collected from wells MW4 and MW6 at concentrations of 160 µg/1 and 110' gg/l, <br /> respectively BTEX compounds were not detected in any of the ground water samples V41 <br /> MTBE was detected in samples MW4 and MW6 by EPA method 8021 B at 1rr'ug/1 and <br />' 13 ug/1 and were reconfirmed with EPA method 8260B at 19 ug/1 and 18 ug/l, respectively <br /> • No other fuel oxygenates were detected in any of the samples Ground water elevations are <br /> IAdvanced GeaEnvtronmental,Inc <br /> , <br />