My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MARCH
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0507955
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2020 1:43:03 PM
Creation date
3/26/2020 1:37:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0507955
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007848
FACILITY_NAME
MARCH LANE UNDERPASS/RR
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
MARCH
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
MARCH LN
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
k'g KLEINFELDER <br /> Total petroleum hydrocarbons as referenced to gasoline (TPH-G) was detected in the <br /> groundwater sample collected from temporary well EB-1/TW-1 at a concentration of 62.4 µg/1. <br /> UEHs were reported at 0.130 mg/1 and 0.262 mg/l, respectively, from groundwater samples <br /> collected from temporary wells TW-1/EB-1 and TW-2/EB-2. No other analytes were detected in <br /> the two groundwater samples at or above laboratory reporting limits. The UEHs found in <br /> groundwater may be a result of cross contamination. It is Kleinfelder's opinion that the TPH-G <br /> found in groundwater is likely the result of an unknown offsite source. <br /> Two sets of blanks were submitted for analyses during construction of the two temporary wells. <br /> The field and trip blanks submitted for analyses during sampling of groundwater from temporary <br /> well EB-2/TW-2 did not contain any detectable concentration of the requested analyses. <br /> However, toluene was detected in the field and trip blank collected during the groundwater <br /> sampling of TW-1/EB-1 at 0.709 µg/1 and 0.654 µg/l, respectively. Toluene, was not detected in <br /> any of the soil or groundwater samples submitted for analyses. Because toluene was not detected <br /> in either soils or groundwater during our assessment, it is unlikely that the toluene was a result of <br /> contamination originating from the project site. Although blank water is periodically checked at <br /> the analytical laboratory prior to use, it is Kleinfelder's experience that blank water from the <br /> laboratory may on rare occasions be contaminated, depending on the blank waters source or <br /> potential contaminants in the lab. Toluene is a common constituent in wide variety of <br /> applications including adhesives, solvents, dyes, detergents, gums, lacquers, resins etc.. <br /> Based on the results of this assessment, Kleinfelder has detailed several conclusions and <br /> recommendations on the handling of soil and groundwater during construction of the site. Those <br /> recommendations and others are detailed in Chapter 7 of this report. <br /> This report is subject to the limitations found in Chapter 8 of this report. <br /> 20-3712-08.E01/2018R510 Page 2 of 16 <br /> © 1998,Kleinfelder, Inc. July 9, 1998 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.