Laserfiche WebLink
k' ■ KLEINFELDER <br /> 3 BACKGROUND <br /> Kleinfelder conducted a Phase I Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and Limited <br /> Phase II Assessment of the property identified as the future grade separations on March Lane at <br /> the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and the Southern Pacific Railroad (SPRR) crossings in <br /> Stockton, California. The ESA was completed in accordance with the scope and limitations of <br /> our proposal (20-3712-08 dated April 10, 1996) and ASTM Practice E1527-94. One of the items <br /> of concern was as follows. <br /> Two of the six Cortese listed facilities and a PHS/EHD listed facility that all occupied the same <br /> location (BP #11190, Mobile Service Station, and Tosco Northwest Company No. 11190, all <br /> located near the UPRR site) have the potential to adversely impact the UPRR site soil and <br /> groundwater. It is unknown if releases from these facilities have had an impact on groundwater. <br /> In addition, the vertical and lateral extent of soil contamination is unknown. Although the <br /> contamination may exist beneath the subject property, it is unlikely that it would encounter the <br /> actual work zone. The remaining four Cortese facilities, a LUST facility, and a Cal-Sites facility <br /> (Nor Mac, Inc., Fire Station #II, St. Mary's High School, Arnaiz Development/Palm Plaza <br /> Center, AAMCO,Coit Drapery Service,and HF Hawley Chemical Company)are unlikely to have <br /> an impact on the subject property because of their distance to the site and the contamination of <br /> soil only. However, if contamination arises on the subject property, clean-up is usually the <br /> responsibility of the responsible party, e.g. Tosco, Mobil, BP, AAMCO, etc. For clarification, <br /> Palm Plaza Center is located adjacent to the south of the UPRR site. The other facilities are <br /> located approximately one half to one mile from both sites. <br /> At the time of our previous ESA, the underpass project was not anticipated to encounter <br /> groundwater. It is our understanding that construction of the drilled shafts at the UPRR site will <br /> now encounter groundwater. Because the quality of the site groundwater is unknown, <br /> Kleinfelder recommended either using a shallow foundation system or sampling and analyzing <br /> site groundwater for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) as referenced to gasoline, Total <br /> Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TEPH) as referenced to diesel and motor oil, Benzene, <br /> Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylene (BTEX), and total lead related to reported releases from <br /> Tosco, Mobil, and BP facilities. The main concerns if groundwater contamination exists is <br /> potential exposure of workers to the contamination and the handling and disposal of the <br /> contaminated soil/groundwater. The results of the subsequent investigation are detailed in this <br /> report as follows. <br /> 20-3712-08.E01/2018R510 Page 5 of 16 <br /> 0 1998, Kleinfelder. Inc. July 9, 1998 <br />