Laserfiche WebLink
s <br /> KEI-J92-0205.R4 <br /> July 6, 1994 <br /> Page 6 <br /> largely of clayey slit underlain by apparently continuous layers of <br /> clay. The sand unit noted in the preceding paragraph may have an <br /> important role in the recharge of the uppermost aquifer underlying <br /> the site. <br /> WATER WELL SURVEY <br /> In an EMCON Associates (EMCON) report (dated November 30, 1989) <br /> prepared for adjacent sites undergoing environmental investiga- <br /> tions, reference is made to a well survey conducted by Woodward <br /> Clyde Consultants (Woodward Clyde) in 1984 . The well survey data <br /> was revised or amended in later Woodward Clyde reports in 1987 and <br /> 1989 . According to information contained in this well survey, no <br /> domestic water wells were located within one mile of the general <br /> area where the Unocal site is situated. In general, the quality of <br /> the shallow ground water is rated poor due to high sodium content. <br /> According to the EMCON report, the Woodward Clyde well survey also <br /> identified two wells that are located in the general area of the <br /> Stockton Port Terminal. These wells are 135 feet and 200 feet <br /> deep, respectively, and are used for landscaping and industrial <br /> purposes. Apparently, one of these wells have been observed to be <br /> . contaminated with oil since 1966, as recorded during Department of <br /> Water Resources (DWR) water level measurements. The screened <br /> interval of these two wells are apparently not given on the DWR <br /> sheets. The distances from the two wells to the Unocal site are <br /> not known to KEI. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON CONTAMINATION <br /> 1. Soil Contamination Delineation and Remediation <br /> Analytical results of the initial soil samples collected from <br /> the former fuel tank pit at the Unocal site indicated non- <br /> detectable concentrations of TPH as gasoline and BTEX for all <br /> samples, except for 2 .2 mg/kg of TPH as gasoline detected in <br /> sample SW2 , and O . o10 mg/kg of xylenes detected in sample SW4 <br /> (Figure 2) . TPH as diesel was non-detectable in all samples, <br /> except for samples SW2 and SW3 , which showed concentrations of <br /> TPH as diesel at 120 mg/kg and 2. 7 mg/kg, respectively. <br /> However, after additional excavation, the analytical results <br /> of soil samples SW2-A, SW2-B, SW2-C, and SW2-D (collected from <br /> the southeast sidewall of the tank pit) indicated non-detect- <br /> able concentrations of TPH as gasoline and BTEX. TPH as <br /> diesel concentrations ranged from non-detectable to 9 . 5 mg/kg. <br /> The results of the soil analyses are summarized in Table 6. <br />