My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008936
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2835
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0001205
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008936
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2020 10:21:30 AM
Creation date
3/30/2020 10:15:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008936
RECORD_ID
PR0001205
PE
2951
FACILITY_ID
FA0004012
FACILITY_NAME
UNOCAL BULK PLANT #0950
STREET_NUMBER
2835
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2835 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
kn KLEINFELDER <br /> f <br /> 4 RESULTS <br /> 41 GROUND WATER GRADIENT <br /> On June 2, 1989, the local ground water gradient in the vicinity of the Unocal facility was to <br /> the east-southeast. The overall gradient direction did not appear to change throughout the <br /> day in response to the tidal fluctuations in the San Joaquin River. The water level in the <br /> San Joaquin River changed by approximately 3 5 feet over the period of water level <br /> monitonng The tidal fluctuations are shown in Plate 4. The contours of ground water <br /> elevation for morning, afternoon, and evening are shown in Plates 5, 6, and 7, respectively <br /> Data from piezometers with more than 0 1 foot of floating product were not included in the <br /> contouring because the floating product likely creates a measurable depression in the water <br /> table. While correction factors based on the density ratio of product and water can be <br /> applied, these factors are often inaccurate when the product thickness is small. Therefore, <br /> data from P11, P12, and P16 (which contained 033, 021, and 038 feet of product, <br /> respectively) were not contoured <br /> 4 2 GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> No BTEX or TPH were detected in any of the wells on the Unocal facility, with the <br /> exception of MW-5. BTEX and TPH (described by the laboratory as an unknown <br /> hydrocarbon) were detected in MW-5 These results, and the results of previous sampling <br /> in July 1988, are shown in Table 3 <br /> i <br /> 4 3 FLOATING PRODUCT ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> The two samples of floating product collected from piezometers P12 and P16 along Stork <br /> Road were identified by the analytical laboratory as being composed largely of gasoline <br /> with some diesel Diesel comprises about 0.5 percent of the sample collected from P16 <br /> (east of Unocal) and about 5 percent of the sample collected from P12 (north-northeast of <br /> Unocal) The results are as follows: <br /> Sample Location Sample ID TPH as diesel (mg/1) TPH as gasoline (mg/1) <br /> P12 19290 53,000 1,000,000 <br /> P16 19289 7,600 1,700,000 <br /> 194-89-1112 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.