Laserfiche WebLink
KEI-J92-0205 .R2 <br /> October 6, 1992 <br /> Page 3 <br /> was observed at a depth of about 12 feet below grade on July 30, <br /> 1992 . <br /> ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> All samples were analyzed by Sequoia Analytical Laboratory in <br /> Concord, California, and were accompanied by properly executed <br /> Chain of Custody documentation. All soil and water samples were <br /> analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) as gasoline by EPA <br /> method 5030/modified 8015, TPH as diesel by EPA method 3550/modi- <br /> fied 8015 , and benzene, toluene, xylenes , and ethylbenzene (BTX&E) <br /> by EPA method 8020. <br /> Analytical results of the initial soil samples collected from the <br /> fuel tank pit indicated non-detectable concentrations of TPH as <br /> gasoline and BTX&E for all samples, except for 2 . 2 ppm of TPH as <br /> gasoline detected in sample SW2 , and 0 . 010 ppm of xylenes detected <br /> in sample SW4 . TPH as diesel was non-detectable in all samples , <br /> except for samples SW2 and SW3 , which showed concentrations of TPH <br /> as diesel at 120 ppm and 2 .7 ppm, respectively. However, after <br /> additional excavation, the analytical results of soil samples SW2- <br /> A, SW2-B, SW2-C, and SW2-D (collected from the southeast sidewall <br /> of the tank pit) indicated non-detectable concentrations of TPH as <br /> gasoline and BTX&E. TPH as diesel concentrations ranged from non- <br /> detectable to 9 5 ppm. The results of the soil analyses are sum- <br /> marized in Table 1. <br /> Analytical results of the water sample (W-1) collected from the <br /> fuel tank pit indicated 1, 500 ppb of TPH as gasoline, 2 , 800 ppb of <br /> TPH as diesel, and a non-detectable concentration of benzene The <br /> results of the water analyses are summarized in Table 2 Copies of <br /> jthe laboratory analyses and the Chain of Custody documentation are <br /> attached to this report. <br /> DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on the analytical results of the final soil samples that were <br /> collected during the removal of the underground storage tanks, it <br /> appears that the ma]ority of the contaminated soil in the vicinity <br /> of the former tank pit has been removed However, based on the <br /> analytical results of the ground water sample that was collected <br /> from the tank pit, and in accordance with the guidelines estab- <br /> lished by the RWQCB, further work is necessary at the site <br /> Therefore, in order to comply with the requirements of the RWQCB <br /> and the SJCPHS , KEI recommends the reimplementation of monitoring <br /> and sampling of the existing monitoring wells at the site. This <br /> program is recommended in order to evaluate the current ground <br /> water quality, and to determine the ground water flow direction <br />