Laserfiche WebLink
Stantec • • <br /> April 13, 2009 <br /> Page 5 of 13 <br /> Reference: Response to RWQCB March 11, 2009 Letter <br /> significant variation in lithologies occurs between borings TS/MW-2D and TS/MW-3D <br /> (located approximately 18 feet apart and both continuously cored). In TS/MW-2D, <br /> poorly-graded sand from 111 to 116 feet below ground surface (bgs) is replaced in <br /> TS/MW-3D by clayey sand (111 to 112.5 feet bgs) and clay (112.5 to 116 feet bgs).18 <br /> feet lateral distance. Another example is the two approximately 7-foot thick sands <br /> between 102 and 117 feet bgs in boring OW-3DR replaced by mainly clay and a 1.5-foot <br /> thick clayey sand in boring OW-8D at similar depths. <br /> The RWQCB suggests the coarse-grained unit at 125 feet in TS/MW-3D and OW-8D is <br /> laterally continuous. As shown in the boring logs, the data do not support lateral <br /> continuity of this unit. The TS/MW-3D sand extends from 124.5 to 137 feet bgs and <br /> consists mainly of clayey sand and gravel with silty sand and silt. The OW-81D sand <br /> consists of silty sand and poorly-graded sand and extends only from 117 to 121 feet <br /> bgs where sample recovery ends near the bottom of the boring at 125 feet. <br /> The RWQCB points out that..."the base of the cross-section schematic is truncated <br /> below PS/MW-20D where the coarse grained bed should be connected between OW-8D <br /> and OW-3101R." The base of the cross-section is truncated because boring PS-MW-20D extends <br /> to a depth of 107 feet and there is no data below this depth to support the purported continuity of <br /> the coarse-grained unit over this distance of nearly 800 feet. <br /> 4 The cross-section also shows that monitoring well OW-5D, which is located <br /> about 1,500 feet downgradient from source area well TS/MW-2D and screened in <br /> the same fine grained stratum, contains similar detections as TS/MW-2D. The <br /> three D zone monitoring wells (OW-8D, PS/MW-20D, and OW-3DR) located in <br /> between these two wells are not screened in the same fine grained unit but also <br /> contain similar detections of TPHg, TPHd, and benzene. <br /> The borehole data provide evidence that individual fine and coarse grained strata <br /> within the D--zone do not occur at uniform depths throughout the entire site. <br /> However, this geometry is commonplace since local fluvial processes that <br /> deposited the beds rarely, if ever, superposition individual strata within a bed like <br /> a layer cake. As discussed in the previous comment, the D zone unit as a whole is <br /> laterally continuous and transmits contaminants well downgradient of the source <br /> area. Therefore, contrary to statements in the Assessment Report, any wells <br /> screened within any depth of the D zone water bearing unit, including OW-8D and <br /> OW-5D, are in communication with each other. The similar contaminant <br /> concentrations observed in OW-5D and TS/MW-2D call into question whether the <br /> proposed communication test is warranted. It does show, however, that adequate <br /> communication exists within and between individual D zone strata. <br /> STTC disagrees with most of the specifics and the general conclusion presented above. <br /> RWQCB states that wells OW-5D and TS/MW-2D are screened in the same fine-grained <br /> stratum. This is not the case. As outlined above and in the Assessment Report, <br /> TS/MW-2D is screened from 111 to 116 feet bgs in poorly-graded sand. Well OW-5D is <br /> screened from 84 to 94 feet bgs in silty clay, silt, and sandy silt. The screen in well <br /> I\STTC-Stockton\Reports\Response to Comments\RWQCB Letter 3-11-09\STTC Response to RWQCB 3-11-09 Letter Final.doc <br />