My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009171
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2020 11:50:21 AM
Creation date
3/30/2020 11:19:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009171
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004011
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON-FUEL TERMINAL
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
577
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9tantec • <br /> April 13, 2009 <br /> Page 9 of 13 <br /> Reference: Response to RWQCB March 11, 2009 Letter <br /> utilized three injection wells (IS-1, IS-2, and IS-3) and evaluation monitoring well <br /> AR/MW-5A, all located on the far west side of the BP 40T terminal approximately 600 <br /> feet from the subsequently installed ozone injection arrays. Stantec is currently <br /> searching through the archives to determine if an appropriately located MNA study has <br /> been performed that would allow quantitative calculation of biodegradation rates <br /> downgradient of the arrays. Analytical data from wells downgradient of the arrays <br /> indicate significant reductions in groundwater impacts have occurred as a result of <br /> installation of the arrays in late 2004. Therefore, these data indicate that the MNA <br /> study would need to be performed somewhat contemporaneously with a potential failure <br /> of the arrays for it to be relevant. Alternatively, the MNA study should at least be <br /> conducted subsequent to the reduction of groundwater impacts downgradient from the <br /> arrays. <br /> 8 For the proposed TS/MW-2D oxygen-injection pilot study, we are concerned that <br /> there may be significant limitations to using bottled oxygen to deliver the oxygen to <br /> groundwater. This proposed methodology was employed at a nearby site last year where <br /> bi-weekly injections of 13-pound oxygen bottles were used to attempt to attain a DO <br /> concentration of 10 milligrams per liter (mg/L) to promote biodegradation. Results <br /> were mixed, even after equipping the injection wells with diffuser tips designed to <br /> deliver the oxygen directly to water bearing units considerably shallower than the D zone <br /> units that will be targeted at.STTC. <br /> The STTC must supplement the description of the oxygen-injection pilot study to show <br /> (1) how they calculated that the oxygen will be delivered with sufficient pressure to <br /> overcome the 110-foot groundwater column overlying the TS/MW-2D well screen and <br /> (2) stoichiometrically demonstrate that twice-monthly 13-lb oxygen injections are sufficient <br /> to oxidize the petroleum hydrocarbon mass present in the target zone. <br /> Typical large bottled oxygen cylinders deliver approximately 150 cubic feet of oxygen with a <br /> weight of approximately 13.3 pounds and are pressurized to approximately 2,015 pounds per <br /> square inch (psi). Hydrostatic pressure increases at the rate of approximately 4.3 psi for every <br /> ten feet of water depth. The hydrostatic pressure of a 110-foot water column is calculated to be <br /> slightly less than 50 psi. <br /> The following formula is used to calculate the Minimum Injection Pressure, which is the <br /> hydrostatic pressure or the pressure on the water column due only to the water column height <br /> above the sparge point. <br /> Phydrostatic = (y H2O)*(hhydrostatic) <br /> Where: <br /> '1120 = Specific weight of water @ 0 degrees Celsius = 62.4 /b Ib <br /> t <br /> hhydrostaoc Depth to top of well screen (DTTWS) - Depth to water(DTW) = h(ft) <br /> I.\STTC-Stockton\Reports\Response to Comments\RWCCB Letter 3-11-09\STTC Response to RWQCB 3-11-09 Letter Final.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.