My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009171
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2020 11:50:21 AM
Creation date
3/30/2020 11:19:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009171
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004011
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON-FUEL TERMINAL
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
577
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Y • <br /> BORE HOLE DESTRUCTION CALCS. <br /> BORE HOLE <br /> 55 feet deep, with 10"diameter, 8"casing <br /> Volume of this bore hole is approximately 1.125 cubic yards <br /> EXCAVATION FOR WELL HEAD PER PHS/EHD WELL STANDARDS <br /> 3 feet deep, three feet wide, three feet long <br /> Volume of this excavation is approximately I cubic vard <br /> Total minimum volume oferout reauirks approximately 2 cubic yards <br /> VOLUME OF NEAT CEMENT PLACE IN HOLE WITHOUT PRESSURE GROUT <br /> 8 yards total placed in bore hole. This volume(6 extra yards) is equivalent to an additional bore hole with <br /> a 10"diameter, 300 feet deep. <br /> QUESTIONS <br /> Should we sign off? <br /> Is this unapproved procedure equivalent to the conditions of the permit issued? <br /> Does the remaining potential contamination pose a risk to the lower part of the well which is not <br /> destroyed? <br /> DISCUSION WITH UNIT II AND IV MANAGERS(6-22-98) <br /> Grout not placed per permit conditions set by CVRWQCB,the comparative quality of actual effectiveness <br /> yet to be determined. Lower section(44' bgs)well casing petroleum hydrocarbon contamination may be a <br /> critical issue as it relates to vertical transport(conduit to lower aquifer). CVRWQCB has issued a letter to <br /> the RP (Tesoro, 3-12-98) directing them to clear the destroyed upper 55' and lower section to completely <br /> discover the total depth of this well and destroy it under pressurized conditions. On July 18, 1998 <br /> PHS/EHD staff met with Emcon to discuss the situation and PHS/EHD requested that they submit a report <br /> which details the site activities for the February 6, 1998 well destruction. This report is to be reviewed by <br /> CVRWQCB and PHS/EHD. It is likely that verification of the contamination and grouting process will be <br /> required followed by deeper interval destruction. <br /> Tesoro Well Destruction Notes <br /> 6-22-98 VI/ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.