My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009171
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2020 11:50:21 AM
Creation date
3/30/2020 11:19:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009171
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004011
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON-FUEL TERMINAL
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
577
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CALIFORNIA REGIO�WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD • � <br /> Cal/EPA <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY R ON <br /> Sacramento, <br /> Roumento, Road,Suite 0 <br /> Sacramento,CA 95827-3098 <br /> Phone 916 255-3000 ` <br /> FAX(916)255-3015 S+I'"I Pete Wilson,Governor <br /> 93 Pl^f� 13 PM 12: 4 9 <br /> 12 March 1998 <br /> Ms. Marilyn Guthrie <br /> Tesoro Refining, Marketing, and Supply Company <br /> 999 Third Avenue, Suite 4000 <br /> Seattle,WA 98104 <br /> ABANDONMENT OF TESORO WELL 17A1 AT STOCKTON BULK TERMINAL, STOCKTON, <br /> CALIFORNIA (San Joaquin County) <br /> Regional Board staff and San Joaquin staff have been working closely together regarding the quesion of <br /> abandonment of this unused production well at Tesoro's distribution terminal in Stockton. <br /> Abandonment of this well was proposed and approved by staff of the Regional Board and San Joaquin <br /> County during the summer of 1997. Subsequent field investigation by EMCON found a well in nearly <br /> the same location as 17A1 it did not very closely match the description given in the log for 17A1. The <br /> known well was found to be significantly shallower than the reported 200-foot depth of 17A1, and <br /> seemed also to be of different diameter. It was additionally found to contain 4 feet of floating product. <br /> Staff requested analyses of the product and videologging of the well. These tasks were performed, and <br /> it was concluded that the known well probably was 17A1 in a silted-up condition. The product was <br /> found to be different from gasoline or diesel. <br /> Based on these results, staff of both agencies and EMCON concluded that further search for a"missing" <br /> well was unnecessary, and that work should proceed to abandon this well as proposed for well VAL <br /> The work was scheduled for 6 February 1998, and was observed by staff of San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Division. The abandonment was to have involved perforating the casing and <br /> pressure grouting the well for its entire available depth. Several problems including bad weather were <br /> encountered. Field observations by San Joaquin County staff found that the agreed-upon procedures, <br /> which were in accord with standards of the County and State,were not followed. The casing was not <br /> perforated, and part of it was extracted. The grout was not applied in a continuous operation and was <br /> not applied under pressure. <br /> These inadequacies in the procedures are of concern to staff of both agencies. The potential for an <br /> unused deep production well serving as a conduit for contamination already known at the site was what <br /> prompted Tesoro's initial proposal to destroy the well. The additional discovery of free product in the <br /> well adds to this concern. Staff are further concerned that the full depth of this well is not known,but <br /> may be significantly greater than the 54 feet that was documented in the grouting operation. The well <br /> log stated 200 feet to be the depth, and the soundings of the well prior to the attempted abandonment <br /> suggested a depth of around 90 feet. The remaining depth may be silted up or blocked by collapsed <br /> casing. Therefore, staff of both agencies now concur that a more stringent approach to well destruction <br /> should be taken in this case. <br /> rft <br /> Recycled Paper Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of California's water resources,and <br /> ensure their proper allocation and efficient use for the benefit of present and future generations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.