My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009171
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2020 11:50:21 AM
Creation date
3/30/2020 11:19:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009171
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004011
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON-FUEL TERMINAL
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
577
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CALIFORNIA REGIO&WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD • Cal/EPA <br /> I CENTRAL VALLEY R6. ON <br /> 3443 Routier Road,Suite A <br /> vsq�� Sacramento.CA 95827-3098 <br /> Phone(916)255-3000 <br /> FAX(916)255-3015 _ Pete Wilson,Governor <br /> 21 August 1997 <br /> Mr. Rob Donovan <br /> Tesoro Refining, Marketing and Supply Company <br /> 320 S.W. Stark, Ste. 511 <br /> Portland, Or. 97204 <br /> WELLS PROPOSED FOR DECOMMISSIONING AT STOCKTON TERMINALS SITES(SAN <br /> JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA) <br /> Staff has reviewed the workplan dated 15 May 1997 submitted by EMCON on behalf of the Stockton <br /> Terminals Technical Committee (STTC) for decommissioning a number of monitoring wells and water <br /> supply wells at the Committee's facilities in Stockton. In reviewing the proposal and workplan, staff <br /> considered, and discussed with EMCON staff, several issues. The issues included questions about the <br /> rationale for the proposed decommissioning, potential usefulness of the wells in monitoring efforts, <br /> location, construction and condition of the wells, and potential for spreading contamination by serving <br /> as conduits to deeper water-bearing zones. Most of these issues were recognized in the workplan. Staff <br /> also discussed with management of POSDEF,the cogeneration plant on whose facility grounds some of <br /> the wells in question are located, whether they had any concerns. Both EMCON and San Joaquin <br /> County Environmental Health staff were consulted during the review process. <br /> This letter (1)summarizes staff's understanding of the results of the decommissioning efforts <br /> undertaken to date, (2) documents the requests for further efforts that have been made by Board staff <br /> and San Joaquin County Environmental Health staff, and(3) responds specifically to the proposed <br /> decommissioning of certain monitoring wells at the facilities. <br /> i. Resuits of work to date: As you know,we approved the decommissioning of the two water supply <br /> wells, 17A1 and 8R2,by letter dated 11 July 1997. Field work subsequently undertaken by EMCON <br /> has been discussed in several telephone conversations between Board staff and staff of EMCON and San <br /> Joaquin County Environmental Health. Based on these conversations, staff understands that well 8R2 <br /> was found already to have been decommissioned. Staff also understands that a water supply well that <br /> was found in the vicinity of well 17A1 could not be positively identified as 17AI. Neither the observed <br /> diameter nor the depth as sounded (90 feet rather than 200 feet) coincided with the description given on <br /> the driller's log obtained from the California Department of Water Resources (DWR). In addition, <br /> there was some question as to whether the location was the same as given on the DWR log. (All <br /> discussants agree that the notation of the DWR log regarding distance to the well from a known point is <br /> difficult to read clearly). Last and most important, four feet of floating product were found in the well.. <br /> 2 Staff requests for further efforts to identify the well and the product: Regulatory staff of both San <br /> Joaquin County and the Board concur in requesting further confirmation that this well is 17AI, and have <br /> asked for analysis of the product, videologging of the well, and, if further confirmation is needed, <br /> Reryded Paper Our mission is to preserve and enhance the quality of California's water resources.and <br /> ensure their proper allocation and efficient use for the benefit of present and future generanons. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.