My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009171
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2020 11:50:21 AM
Creation date
3/30/2020 11:19:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009171
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004011
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON-FUEL TERMINAL
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
577
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
amcon <br /> 1433 North Market Boulevartl.Sacramento,Califomia 95834-1943 . <br /> (916)92g}3900.Fax(916)928-3341 <br /> 97 AUG - I Ali 11: 46 <br /> July 31, 1997 <br /> Project C42-001.026 <br /> Ms. Gail Wiggett <br /> California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> Central Valley Region <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A <br /> Sacramento,CA 95827-3098 <br /> Re: Tesoro Water Supply Well No. 17A1 <br /> Dear Ms. Wiggett: <br /> As you requested, I am sending you a site plan with the apparent location of the subject <br /> well 17AL Contrary to our previous discussion, it appears the well is correctly located <br /> (i.e., DWR well log [see attachment] description matches the actual observed well <br /> location). The well location description on the DWR log is difficult to read. The field <br /> geologist misread the well location distance from Navy Drive as 150 feet, when it should <br /> have been 250 feet. <br /> As we discussed, the well diameter and well depth on the DWR log do not match field <br /> observations. I will be following up on these items with you next week. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> EMC <br /> Charles S. Me nger <br /> Project Manager <br /> Attachments: Site Plan <br /> DWR Log <br /> cc: Ron Rowe, San Joaquin County, Environmental Health <br /> SA(W:\PJ0\9C4SDC420012.6BT-9Tpa:1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.