Laserfiche WebLink
Wendy L. Cohen • • <br /> 4 15 March 1993 <br /> Ground Water Monitoring Results <br /> A more extensive ground water sampling program was conducted after installation of <br /> additional monitoring wells. The program also included more wells not previously <br /> sampled during the preliminary ground water sampling program. <br /> 1 . The report states that ST's eastern property boundary contained 0.36 foot of <br /> free product (FP) on 21 September 19 <br /> PS/MW-16. 92 and 0.01 foot of FP also was detected in <br /> TS/MW-1 and This characterization of the extent of FP is wholly <br /> inaccurate. Following is a complete description of the FP extent obtained from <br /> Table 7 which was based on the September 1992 sampling. <br /> Well Number Product Thickness <br /> (feet) <br /> AR/MW-IA Sheen <br /> AR-MW-9A Sheen <br /> AR-MW-11A Sheen <br /> PS/P-11 0.08 <br /> PS/MW-14 0.36 <br /> PS/MW-16 0.02 <br /> ST/MW-1 0.89 <br /> TO/T-1 TSheen <br /> Sheen <br /> TO/T-5 Sheen <br /> TO/T-8 Sheen <br /> TO/T-12 Sheen <br /> TO/R-1 through R-6 Sheen <br /> The report did not state how often the wells are checked for FP or if there is <br /> an ongoing bailing program. The above table shows that it was PS/MW-14 which <br /> had 0.36 foot of FP and ST/MW-1 had 0.89 foot. The table also shows TS-1 had <br /> sheen on the ground water yet the depth to water column of Table 7 says "Ory". <br /> This discrepancy must be explained. <br /> 2. The report states that except for one, all B-zone monitoring wells showed <br /> contamination, and additional data will be needed to determine its horizontal <br /> extent. Yet, as stated above, no additional work is proposed. Thus, the <br /> lateral extent of contamination in the B-zone is not defined and the vertical <br /> extent of contamination at the entire terminal is not defined. <br /> 3. The report states that ground water samples indicated two separate areas over <br /> the site where TPHG values exceeded 100,000 119/1 , and low concentrations of <br /> BTEX were detected in ground water samples from an upgradient piezometer PS/CB- <br /> 1 . The significance of 100,000 pg/l was not stated. Plate 3 of Harding Lawson <br /> Associate's 1990 report shows the location of Stockton Petroleum (SP) northeast <br /> of Time Oil and adjacent to PS/CB-1 's location. Although PS/CB-1 appears to be <br /> upgradient of SP, the latter's activities, which were not included in the site <br /> history, could have affected the ground water beneath SP and also the ground <br /> water being monitored by PS/CB-1 . PS/CB-1 was not resampled to confirm earlier <br /> results. <br />