Laserfiche WebLink
S ECOR <br />' Request for No Further Action <br /> Chevron Station 9-2396 <br /> December 16 2004 <br /> Page 8 <br />' • Porosity of the various soil types beneath the site range from 10-20% for silts and clays <br /> to 20-40% for sand A conservative 35% site-wide porosity was assumed to estimate <br />' the available water in saturated soils <br /> The equation used for estimating the mass of MtBE remaining In groundwater is presented <br />' in Appendix G The results of this calculation indicate that approximately 0 011 pounds of <br /> MtBE could remain in groundwater beneath the site However, the most recent analytical <br /> data (Appendix D) show all constituents below method detection limits <br />' 5.0 SITE REMEDIATION <br />' Remedial actions at the site consist of the removal of the six underground storage tanks <br /> and associated piping, and the removal of 1,500 ft3 of soil associated with past site <br /> assessment activities The primary sources of contamination have been removed and <br /> hydrocarbon contamination at the site is limited to shallow soils near the former USTs and <br /> around the station building (Figures 7 and 8) Therefore, concentrations of hydrocarbons at <br /> the site are expected to decrease with time due to natural attenuation Typical applications <br />' of Best Available Technology (BATS) to similar hydrocarbon plumes include oxidation of the <br /> plume or thermal treatment Oxidation of the plume appears to be the more efficient use of <br /> materials since 1) due to the close proximity to the ground surface oxygen concentrations <br /> lie are not expected to be deficient, and 2) close proximity to the surface makes thermal <br /> treatment of the soil impractical <br /> No formal risk assessment has been performed for the site However, assuming that the <br /> site will be continued to be used for industrial purposes, the risk associated with the <br /> 1 contamination described is considered low While no fate and transport modeling has been <br /> performed, the mobility of the contamination identified at the site is expected to be low <br /> Factors causing low mobility of hydrocarbon contamination include <br /> • adsorption of the remaining hydrocarbons to particulate surfaces, <br /> • lack of rainfall or atmospheric moisture to transport the hydrocarbons past the top <br />' layers of shallow soils, <br /> paved surface in the site vicinity prevents downward movement of surface water, <br /> • high surface tension of water in silt and clay in the shallow soils inhibit downward <br />' movement of solutes, <br /> • depth to groundwater of 50 feet or more <br />' 6.0 CONCLUSIONS <br /> MtBE was reported in monitoring well MW-2 at a concentration of 7 pgll Detected <br />' concentrations of MtBE in well MW-2 are below the California EPA primary (13 pg/1) <br /> maximum contaminant level (MCL) Detected concentrations of MtBE in well MW-1 are <br /> below both the California primary and secondary MCLs <br />' 11Chevron1923961Reports\FINAL_NFAR_REPORT doe <br />