My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1987-1992
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506203
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1987-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2020 3:01:00 PM
Creation date
3/31/2020 2:27:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1987-1992
RECORD_ID
PR0506203
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007271
FACILITY_NAME
LINCOLN CNTR ENV REMEDIATION TRUST
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
353
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
& EMORANDUM <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROLBOARD - CENTRAL VALLETREGION <br /> 3443 Routier Road,Suite Phone 916) 361-5600 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 ATSS Phrne 8-495-5600. <br /> TO Antonia Vorsten' FROM. Richard McHenry <br /> Senior Engineer Area Engineer <br /> DATE: 8 March 1990 SIGNATURE: <br /> SUBJECT: LINCOLN VILLAGE PHASE II SAILING PLAN, STOCICTON SAN JGtApf/I/I L17UNTY <br /> (CASE #3002) <br /> A revised Phase II work plan for. site assessment at Lincoln Village Center. dated <br /> 13 February 1990 was reviewed for conformance with our 21 December 1989 Tetter.' My <br /> comments are as follows: <br /> 1. Monthly water level contour maps were not submitted. Ground water elevation data <br /> was submitted which appears to agree with a general ground water northeast <br /> direction of flow, however, contour maps should be developed. The piaceoent and <br /> screening of the proposed monitoring wells should be supported by tF s data. <br /> 2. Laboratory data sheets and chain-of-custody forms should be submit'ted as an <br /> appendage to all reports. Water samples shall be analyzed for EPA 601 compounds. <br /> Page 6 of the work plan states that all samples will be analyzed for PCE only. <br /> 3. The rationale for placement and screening of the proposed monitoring wells, <br /> shallow and deep, were not submitted with the work plan. San Joaquin County has <br /> a standard requirement for a *foot sanitary seal on wells and a minimum distance <br /> requirements from sewer lines which could adversely effect proper site assessment. <br /> 4. The monitoring well installation technique appears adequate, 2 wells are hollow <br /> stem continuous core, 5 wells are hollow stem with split spoon samplirg at 5 foot <br /> intervals. <br /> 5. Evaluation of LVMD Well Nos. 1, 2 and 6 have not been fully addressed- Two deep <br /> (150 ft. ) wells are proposed to determine pollution levels in the deeps- aquifer. <br /> It must be determined if the LVMD wells are a conduit for pollution to the deeper <br /> aquifer, also, these wells should be pumped to determine the relationmip of the <br /> shallow and deeper aquifers. If the LVMD wells are the source of deeler aquifer <br /> pollution, either by inadequate well structure or pumping rates causira downward <br /> migration, remedial action must be taken. A schedule for regularmortoring of <br /> the LVMD wells for EPA 601 compounds should be developed unless it is shown that <br /> these wells are the cause of pollution within the deeper aquifer. <br /> FILE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.