My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1987-1992
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506203
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1987-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2020 3:01:00 PM
Creation date
3/31/2020 2:27:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1987-1992
RECORD_ID
PR0506203
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007271
FACILITY_NAME
LINCOLN CNTR ENV REMEDIATION TRUST
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
353
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Antonia K. J. Vorster 6 December 18, 1989 <br /> In addition, it is uncertain to what degree the San Joaquin County <br /> distance limitations referred to in the revised workplan (pertaining <br /> to the minimal distance of a well to a sewer line, and the depth of <br /> a well 's sanitary seal ) has influenced the consultant's shallow zone <br /> ground water monitoring well design. These limitations are not <br /> necessarily applicable to a ground water monitoring well . The <br /> location of a monitoring well should be based upon the proximity to <br /> a source and the ground water flow direction. Since, in this <br /> investigation, the source is likely a sewer line it is imperative <br /> that samples of ground water be taken as near the source as possible. <br /> Also, the screened interval for wells in the uppermost water bearing <br /> formation should be consistent. Monitoring well #4 is the only <br /> existing monitoring well that is screened below 50 feet and it does <br /> not bridge the water table surface. Monitoring wells #1, #2, and <br /> #3 are all screened to bridge the water table. The location and <br /> screened interval depths for the new shallow zone wells should be <br /> reconsidered based on definable objectives of the investigation <br /> (i .e. , source monitoring and consistency) and not on the county's <br /> distance restrictions. The rationale for the monitoring well <br /> placements and their screened interval depths should be submitted <br /> to us for review. <br /> Therefore, the approval of the shallow zone monitoring well locations <br /> and design are withheld until we can review the water level data <br /> requested in Comment 1 above, and until we can review the well <br /> placement and screening rationale requested above. <br /> 4) The vertical extent of contamination in the vicinity of the LVMD <br /> wells must be determined. Well clusters will be required to <br /> determine the extent of the contamination, both areally and <br /> vertically, and to determine the magnitude and direction of the <br /> vertical hydraulic gradients. Depending upon the lithology of the <br /> site (see Comment 5 below) , it may be necessary to install wells <br /> between the uppermost water bearing zone and the zone intercepted <br /> by the LVMD wells. The rationale for the well clusters' placements <br /> and their screened interval depths should be submitted to us for <br /> review. <br /> 5) The lithological logging of the monitoring wells will be crucial to <br /> the understanding of the site's geology, to establishing the <br /> hydraulic connection between the uppermost water bearing zone and <br /> the deeper aquifer, and to the design of the well clusters, <br /> specifically their screened interval depths. Therefore, I recommend <br /> that for hollow stem auger drilling that soil samples be taken every <br /> five feet or at a noticeable change in the formation (based upon <br /> cuttings and/or drilling progress); for mud rotary drilling that <br /> geophysical logs be taken including long and short normal electrical <br /> resistivity, spontaneous potential , and caliper; and for air <br /> percussion/casing hammer drilling that logging be accomplished by <br /> the continuous monitoring of the cuttings from the cyclone. The <br /> revised workplan should contain the proposed drilling and <br /> lithological logging techniques. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.