Laserfiche WebLink
� s <br /> Section XI Remedial Action <br /> Page 15 Lines 20-25 <br /> Section XI states that " (t)he Settling Dry Cleaning <br /> Defendants shall not be required to commence the additional <br /> public comment period required by Section XI.A. l. f. of the <br /> Consent Decree if they reasonably determine, as reflected in a <br /> written notice served on all Settling Parties, that the changes <br /> to the Proposed Remediation Action Plan could be reasonably <br /> anticipated by the public based upon the alternatives . . . . " <br /> (emphasis added) . To protect the important right of all parties <br /> and the public to comment on the critical Proposed Remediation <br /> Action Plan, either the Court or the Special Master, not the <br /> Settling Dry Cleaning Defendants, should decide whether the <br /> additional public comment period shall be commenced. <br /> Section %III oversight Compliance Review and Comment <br /> Page 22 Line 3 to Page 23 , Line 10 <br /> Paragraphs (A) , (B) and (C) of this section allow <br /> Plaintiff LPL to conduct oversight, monitoring, and review of the <br /> performance of the Work as well as review and provide comments to <br /> the Settling Dry Cleaning Defendants on any aspect of the Work or <br /> any draft or final plan required to be developed pursuant to the <br /> Consent Decree. <br /> Paragraph (D) indicates that the Settling Dry Cleaning <br /> Defendants must reimburse Plaintiff LPL for all reasonable costs <br /> incurred in conducting the oversight, monitoring, observing or <br /> inspecting of the Work at the Site. These "reasonable costs" <br /> LA\16207\031\5000MDCG.002 <br /> -8- <br />