My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2001-2005
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506203
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2001-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2020 2:57:43 PM
Creation date
3/31/2020 2:38:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2001-2005
RECORD_ID
PR0506203
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007271
FACILITY_NAME
LINCOLN CNTR ENV REMEDIATION TRUST
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Donald Bradshaw • - 2 - • November 4, 2005 <br /> system for more complete destruction of PCE in situ, when PCE destruction will not result in the <br /> generation of unacceptable levels of chloride and TDS. Therefore, please submit a two-phased work <br /> plan for implementation of air spagring and SVE, followed by the addition of ozone. Also,please <br /> include a two-phase monitoring program to clearly document that the appropriate concentrations of PCE <br /> have been achieved for addition of ozone, and that the removal of PCE is proceeding as predicted. <br /> In addition, staff requests that the following information be included in the submittal of the two-phased <br /> work plan. First, please provide a brief description of successful ozone sparging systems that have been <br /> used at"similar" sites, and why they are considered similar. Second, in the comprehensive,two-phased <br /> monitoring plan, analysis of arsenic,hexavalent chromium, other dissolved metals, and general minerals <br /> should be included. Baseline concentrations of metals and minerals should be documented before active <br /> remediation begins. After implementation,the frequency of monitoring must ensure that addition of <br /> ozone is not adversely impacting groundwater. Ideally, ozone sparging should decrease the <br /> concentration of many metals in groundwater due to oxidation and precipitation. However, increases in <br /> arsenic and hexavalent chromium have occurred in pilot test situations. Third, please provide a <br /> contingency plan in case any of the dissolved metals increase above baseline conditions and water <br /> quality goals. Finally, please describe how LFR will evaluate what constitutes a"significant" increase in <br /> arsenic, hexavalent chromium or other dissolved metal concentrations. <br /> If you have any questions or comments, please contact Marie McCrink at 916-464-4816, or by email at <br /> mtmccrinkAwaterboards.ca.eov. <br /> �&� V_1,AqAWx( <br /> Marie McCrink, R.G., C.H. <br /> Private Sites Cleanup Unit <br /> cc: Mr.Lucas Goldstein, LFR Levine Fricke <br /> Mr. Mark Adams, Lincoln Center Environmental Remediation Trust <br /> Mr. David Gouker, City of Stockton Public Library, Margaret Troke Branch <br /> Ms. Anne Farr, Ph.D., Farr Associates <br /> Mr. David Sadoff, AIG Environmental <br /> Mr. Phil.Johnson, Sims Grupe Management <br /> Mr. Mike Infurna, San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.