Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Turkatte <br /> July 24, 2015 <br /> Page 4 <br /> probes were installed into and bottom in "an area of impact" as defined by SJCEHD. <br /> Attachment 2 includes a series of figures (Figure 11 through Figure 13) from the RI Report <br /> showing the pre-remediation condition in 1999. As noted in Table 1 of Attachment 1, six of the <br /> soil vapor monitoring probes were installed outside of the area of contamination as perimeter <br /> control points (SVMW-13, -14, -15, -17, -21 and SVMWE-003). The soil vapor monitoring <br /> probes located outside of the original area of contamination are also proposed to be abandoned <br /> by the pressure grout method as these areas would not have ever had contamination that would <br /> represent a threat to groundwater quality. <br /> Confirmation Data <br /> As part of the SVE system optimization activities, in addition to in-line SVE system monitoring <br /> with a photo ionization detector (PID), three rounds of confirmation soil vapor sample collection <br /> were conducted to evaluate the presence of residual Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in the <br /> vadose zone. The confirmation soil vapor samples were collected both from SVE wells and from <br /> multiple depths in undisturbed soil. The SVE well samples were collected from the screen zones <br /> between 10 and 30 feet bgs and the undisturbed samples were collected from multiple depths <br /> between 5 and 20 feet bgs. The RWQCB prefers the collection of confirmation soil vapor <br /> samples from undisturbed soil as these samples best represent residual soil vapor concentration <br /> in the vadose zone at the Site. <br /> The first two rounds of soil-gas confirmation testing in 2010 and 2012 included sampling for <br /> PCE and its degradation products. Results from the first two events showed that only PCE <br /> required further evaluation because all other compounds were near or below their respective <br /> California Human Health Screening Levels (CHHSLs) and the laboratory detection limits. <br /> The 2010 and 2012 confirmation sampling results are shown on Attachment 3, Figure 4 and <br /> Attachment 3, Figure 5 shows the most recent 2013 soil vapor sampling results. The data show <br /> that the concentration of PCE in SVE wells -005, -014, -011, -034, -024, -027, -029 and -033 <br /> were non-detect or below the commercial CHHSL concentration in the final sampling event in <br /> May of 2012. The PCE results reported from samples collected from SVE-019 and -017 were <br /> slightly above the CHHSL in the May 2012 event. PCE concentrations reported from the multi- <br /> depth sample collection conducted in 2010 were all below the CHHSL; however, in the follow- <br /> up sample collection in May of 2012 samples collected from locations SG-1, SG-3 and SG-4 <br /> exceeded the CHHSL mostly in shallow(less than 10 feet bgs) samples. <br /> addendumtoabandonmentwp.doc <br /> engineers I scientists I innovators <br />