My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 3
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
7647
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505534
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2020 4:27:29 PM
Creation date
3/31/2020 4:12:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 3
RECORD_ID
PR0505534
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0006840
FACILITY_NAME
TOSCO SUPER T MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
7647
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
07748014
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
7647 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 of 5 <br /> I did a read-over and saw three concerns... <br /> 1- MW-16 is in City ROW, so the well's location is IN the City and the <br /> LANDOWNER (not the well owner) is the City..l changed the application to <br /> reflect City of Stockton on line 2. <br /> 2- You need to send in a Master File Record (MFR) form. It provides the <br /> billing party to pay any EHD fees NOT covered in the permit fee. I've <br /> attached a MFR here for you to fill out, most large Oil Company's have been <br /> allowing consultants to sign as "Third Party Billing Party" on our form. any <br /> overage in my inspection times goes to YOU....but you can put CP down if <br /> you want... <br /> 3- the money...? onsite four new wells.. application fee, $366 plus four <br /> wells at $122. 366+488=854. you sent in 1098. that's $244 over. but....... <br /> each 'recovered well' requires it's own $122. three of these right? that's $366 <br /> and your onsite permit application doesn't mention these. I have to 'add' a <br /> special note/number on it to get it past my accounting folks. w/o the recovery <br /> wells, you've got an extra $244. add three recovery wells and you have a <br /> $122 deficit see?.. <br /> at least the offsite appiic is fine..one well $122 plus $366 = $488. <br /> so it looks like, up front anyway, you're $122 short..but that's ok. I can't <br /> imagine spending all of the offsite charges so I think you'll be ok.. <br /> besides, you'll be sending in the MFR identifying the billing party that'll pay <br /> any overage if there is any. <br /> you should be ok....I just have to figure out HOW to get my accounting folks to <br /> not get ruffled at a shortage of $122.... <br /> if it's ok with you/your records, I'll indicate only 2 recovery wells for pricing. <br /> that'll add up to six wells ( 4new and 2 recovery) instead of 7 (four new and 3 <br /> recovery)... <br /> but if you need your permits to match numbers in the plan/COP proposal, <br /> then send in the $122. <br /> 1 got the impression there may be a significant time lapse between the time <br /> YOU get the recovery wells UP to the surface and the time Miller Pac gets to <br /> setting the boxes...? with more trips for me to do, your account balance <br /> changes to red quicker. have you got a feeling for the time you start on the <br /> recovery wells until the time I see the boxes set and grout topped off? <br /> mike <br /> 5/16/2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.