Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 of 3 <br /> -you plan an interim gwe. I couldn't put it better myself. I'll need a TRAP (proposal-Plan) so I <br /> can eval and eventually approve it ( paper trail needed for interim/full RAPs). once the TRAP is <br /> approved and goes online, I may change some wells gw sampling frequencies to better eval <br /> effectiveness...or maybe not. I'll let the data and site specific trends dictate my response(s). <br /> Remediation reports are still due on a quarterly basis and I suspect I'll see adequate updates, <br /> conclusions, and recommendations in these.. <br /> -plans to demo the wells for construction are ok too. A Well Destruction WP by September <br /> 2010 sounds fine. add wells? include changes. <br /> -an updated SCM in October 2010 is ok also. May NOT be needed if new <br /> wells/borings/adjusted evaluation of site conditions don't change. Site status updates can be <br /> included in the IRAP quarterlies. But if new soil/gw data expands site understanding, then by <br /> all means, get me an updated SCM. <br /> -WP for assessment, if needed, can also come when the time arrives (need for new wells, soil <br /> borings for delineation,etc) and if GWE influence, effectiveness, and conclusions support need. <br /> I can't imagine what COP/Stantec would gain by advising us of anymore than this/having a <br /> meeting. Although you may request a meeting, lining up my schedule (I'm off ALL Sept 2010) <br /> with my PG and my admin boss is a task....tough, but not impossible. The first thing they'll ask <br /> me is "what's the problem"?..... I have no problem. again, do you? COP? is there some <br /> concern(s) you think I/the EHD has required that you don't want to do? <br /> please re-eval and let me know. I can generate a comment letter with all this in it... <br /> will that help? <br /> mike <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] -- <br /> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 4:00 PM <br /> To: 'Barclay, Diane' <br /> Subject: RE: 7647 Pacific, Stockton <br /> glad to hear it. <br /> any chance the EHD can review the data before we commit? <br /> From: Barclay, Diane [mailto:Diane.Barclay@stantec.com] <br /> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 3:49 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Cc: Lathrop, Shelby S (Shaw Environmental, Inc.) <br /> Subject: 7647 Pacific, Stockton <br /> Hello Mike, <br /> Now that we have completed rebound testing, have another round of monitoring data, and have had a <br /> conference call with the architect for the rebuild project, Shelby and I thought it would be a good time to <br /> suggest a meeting with you to discuss our proposed path forward for this site. Please let me know if you <br /> would like to meet or have a conference call sometime this month, and if so, what days/times would be <br /> good for you —thanks! <br /> R/1 52/11)l n <br />