Laserfiche WebLink
' 07 April 1999 <br /> . AGE-NC Project No 98-0540 <br /> Page 6 of 9 <br /> I41 SOIL PROFILE <br /> A Light brown to brown, moist silty sand, was encountered from surface grade to depths of <br /> approximately 30 feet in each boring A mixture of moist light brown to dark brown silty sand and <br /> sandy silt, with some possible oxidation, was generally encountered from 30 feet to 45 feet bsg A <br /> brown moist , sandy clay, silty clay, medium plasticity,was encountered from 45 feet to 65 feet bsg <br /> Lenses approximately six inches thick of well graded sands, gravelly sands, were encountered from <br /> 45 feet to 65 feet bsg A brown, silty sand, sand-silt mixture, low plasticity, moist, was generally <br /> encountered at depths between 65 feet and 75 feet bsg <br /> Saturated soil was encountered in each boring at depths between 75 feet and 80 feet bsg Boring logs <br /> Iare included in Appendix A <br /> 4 2 FIELD EVIDENCE OF HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED SOIL AND GROUND WATER <br /> Neither petroleum hydrocarbon odor nor discoloration were observed in soil or ground water <br /> samples collected from B3 Organic vapor was detected in soil sample duplicates collected from <br /> B 1(MW-1)and B5(MW-3)at concentrations of 4 to 136 parts per million(ppm) Organic vapor was <br /> not detected in other soil samples <br /> 43 GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> On 11 March 1999 the depths to round water in monitoring well W- - - <br /> p g g s M 1, MW 2, and MW 3 were <br /> measured at 75 02, 75 11, and 75 14 feet below the tops of well casings respectively The ground <br /> water elevation data for MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3 collected during March's ground water <br /> monitoring event is depicted in Appendix B <br /> In March 1999, the gradient was calculated to be 0 004 ft/ft, or approximately 15 feet per mile for <br /> the area located between wells MW-I, MW-2, and MW-3 The ground water monitoring data <br /> I indicates suggests that the ground water flow direction was generally northeast Due to the low <br /> gradient at the site, slight variations in ground water measurements or changes of recharge/discharge <br /> of the local ground water could greatly modify the gradient calculations <br /> y <br /> 44 RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYSIS <br /> The <br /> • soil probe boring samples from P1 and P2 were submitted for analysis of TPH-g, BTEX, Fuel <br /> Advanced LieoEmtronmental,Inc <br />