|
Agenda -5- 30/31 January 2003
<br /> d. County Of San Joaquin And Foothill Sanitary Landfill,Inc.For Construction, Operation,Closure And Evaluation
<br /> Monitoring,Foothill Sanitary Landfill,Municipal Solid Waste (Class III), San Joaquin County.
<br /> e. TRC Companies Inc.and GBF Holdings,LLC.,Post-Closure of Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill,Contra Costa
<br /> County(revised)
<br /> f. Lassen Gold Mining,Inc.,Hayden Hill Mine,Lassen County(revised)
<br /> g. Bob&Kathy Ellinghouse,Cool Village LLC,Cool Village Wastewater Treatment Facility,El Dorado Co.(new)
<br /> h. AKF Development LLC,Post-Closure of Former Spreckels Company Manteca Sugar Plant Lime Ponds,San Joaquin
<br /> County(revised)
<br /> i. Imperial Sugar Company,Holly Sugar Corporation dba Spreckels Sugar Company, Spreckels Sugary Company
<br /> Tracy Facility, San Joaquin County(revised)
<br /> j. Village West Marina Investors,Pegasus Group General Partners,City Of Stockton,Village West Marina
<br /> Maintenance Dredging Project,San Joaquin County(update)
<br /> k. Aerojet General Corporation,WNN Bioremediation Pilot Project,Inactive Rancho Cordova Test Site, Sacramento
<br /> County(new)
<br /> 1. Reclamation District Number 800,Discovery Bay Maintenance Dredging,Contra Costa County(new)
<br /> 30. The Regional Board may meet in closed session to consider personnel matters[Authority: Government Code
<br /> Section 11126(a)J, to discuss either matters in litigation or decisions to initiate litigation[Authority: Government
<br /> Code Section 11 126(e)], or to deliberate on a decision to be reached based upon evidence introduced in a hearing
<br /> [Authority: Government Code Section 11126(c)(3)J Items that may be discussed Heilman v.SWRCB,CVRWQCB et.al. (1)
<br /> CVRWQCB et al. v.Aerojet-General Corporation,et al, County of Sacramento Superior Court Case No.286073, Consolidated
<br /> with Case Nos.288302 and 291981; CVRWQCB,et al. v.Aerojet-General Corporation, et al., U.S.District Court(Eastern
<br /> District of California)Case No. CIVS-86-0064-EJG(consolidated with U.S. v.Aerojet-General Corp.,et al., U.S.District
<br /> Court(Eastern District of California)Case No. CIVS-86-0063-EJG;American States Water Company, et al., v. CVRWQCB et
<br /> al.,Sacramento County Superior Court Case No. 99 AS 05947;(2)Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District v. State
<br /> Water Resources Control Board,et al.,Sacramento County Superior Court Case No. 98CS0170;(3)State of California,
<br /> Department of Toxic Substances Control and CVRWQCB v.Iron Mountain Mines,Inc.et al., U.S. District Court,Eastern
<br /> District of Calif., Case No. CIV-S-91-1167-DFL-PAN and United States v.Iron Mountain Mines,Inc. et al., U.S.District
<br /> Court,Eastern District of Calif., Case No.S-91-0768 DFL/JFM,(4)State of California ex rel California Integrated Waste
<br /> Management Board et al. v.Edward Joseph Filbin et al. (Filbin Tire Fire);(5)National Park Service,El Portal Wastewater
<br /> Treatment Facility,Administrative Civil Liability Order No. 5-01-031;(6)San Francisco Baykeeper,Inc.,et al. v. California
<br /> State Water Resources Control Board, et al., Sacramento County Superior Court Case No. 99CS02722(Toxic Hotspot);(7)
<br /> Coalition for Alternatives to Kiefer Landfill v. California State Water Resources Control Board, et al.,Sacramento County
<br /> Superior Court Case No. Ol CS00728, (8)CVRWQCB v.A Greener Globe Corp.,et al.,Placer County Superior Court Case No.
<br /> SCVI1383, (9)CVRWQCB v.Sonora Mining Corporation,et al. (Jamestown Mine), Tuolumne County Superior Court Case
<br /> No. CV 486;(10)Original Sixteen to One Mine,Inc.v. CVRWQCB(Case No. 5511, County of Sierra);(11)City of Brentwood
<br /> v. Central Valley RWQCB, Contra Costa County Superior Court No.2-0160;(12)People of the State of California and City of
<br /> Lodi vs.M&P Investments,et al.,Eastern District No. CIV 5-00-2441 FCD;(13)R.Lawson Enterprises dba Wildrose
<br /> Vineyards and Robert Lawson v. CRWQCB-CVR,San Joaquin County No. CV 017290;(14)City of Merced and
<br /> Redevelopment Agency of the City of Merced v.R.A.Fields, CVRWQCB,Ninth Circuit Ct. Of Appeals,D.C.No. CV-F 92-5627
<br /> (REC(DLB)ED CA;City of Merced, et al.,v.R.A.Fields,et al., (U.S.Dist. Ct.E.D.Calif.)No. CV-F 91-5627 REC/DLB;(15)
<br /> In the matter of the Petition of the City of Stockton,File No.SWRCB/OCC A-1483;(16)In the matters of the Petitions of
<br /> Meridian Beartrack Company et al.,File Nos.SWRCB/OCCA-1369,A-146(17)In The Matter Of Petition For Review Of
<br /> Adoption Of Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 5-01-256,Sacramento County Boys Ranch, Sacramento County,
<br /> SWRCB/OCC File A-1431;(I8)In the matters of Petition of City of Stockton and County of San Joaquin for Review of Action
<br /> and Failure to Act re Waste Discharge Requirements Order No.R5-2002-0181,SWRCBIOCCA-1524 and Petition of
<br /> DeltaKeeper, WaterKeepers of Northern California and California Sportfishing Alliance for Review of Waste Discharge
<br /> Requirements Order No. R5-2002-0181,SWRCB/OCC A-1524(a);(19)In the matter of the Petition of Sacramento County,
<br /> County of Sacramento, City of Galt, City of Folsom,and City of Elk Grove for Review of Action and Failure to Act re Waste
<br /> Discharge Requirements Order No.R5-2002-0206,SWRCB/OCC A-1538;(20)In the matter of the Petition of DeltaKeeper;
<br /> San Francisco BayKeeper;Natural Resources Defense Council; California Public Interest Research Group; The Ocean
<br /> Conservancy;California Sportfishing Protection Alliance,A-1536(a) and the Petition of Agricultural Water Quality Coalition
<br /> A-1536 for Review of the Agricultural Return Flow Waiver,SWRCB/OCC A-1536;(21) In the matter of the Petition of the-
<br /> Association of Irritated Residents;Communities for Land,Air&Water;DeltaKeeper,for Review of the Confined Animal
<br /> Facility Waiver,SWRCB/OCC A-1537;(22)In the matters of Petition of City of Stockton and County of San Joaquin for
<br /> Review of Action and Failure to Act re Waste Discharge Requirements Order No.R5-2002-0181,SWRCB/OCC A-1524 and
<br /> Petition of DeltaKeeper, WaterKeepers of Northern California and California Sportfishing Alliance for Review of Waste
<br /> Discharge Requirements Order No.R5-2002-0181,SWRCB/OCCA-1524(a);(23)Deltakeeper et al v. California Regional
<br /> Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region,Sac County Sup. Ct. Case No. 03CS00032(Ag Waiver CEQA lawsuit)
<br />
|