Laserfiche WebLink
Theodore 1. Wittmayer <br /> Attorney at Law <br /> 1024West Rod <br /> Stockton, California 95 C`I V <br /> Telephone 957-9160 d U l 2 9 Ig91 <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH <br /> PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> July 23, 1991 <br /> FAX: (213) 395-8971 <br /> Mr. Mark Gilmartin <br /> Straw and Gilmartin <br /> 100 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1325 <br /> Santa Monica, CA 90401 <br /> Re: San Joaquin County Environmental Health Services <br /> Site Code No. 2163 <br /> Montgomery Ward <br /> Stockton, CA 95207, <br /> Dear Mr. Gilmartin: <br /> With respect to your recent correspondence, and also a letter addressed o you <br /> from Ms. Laurie A. Cottula, wherein she provides comments and concerns <br /> pertaining to the May 20, 1991 report of EAI, Inc. , it is still the po ition <br /> of Stone Bros. that the work plans required pursuant to Items 3 and 4 f Ms. <br /> Cottula's letter is the responsibility and the obligation of Montgomery Ward. <br /> By letter dated March 27, 1991, I advised that Stone Bros. had retained the <br /> services of Weston, Inc. to evaluate the earlier work plan. I also included a <br /> copy of their evaluation. Weston, Inc, suggested that the work plan as sub- <br /> mitted was inadequate in that there were insufficient borings and sample <br /> locations to determine the depth and lateral extent of the potential contami- <br /> nation. Weston was also concerned that the work plan did not address the <br /> issue of the removal of the concrete slab or ballast and the associated <br /> piping, and did not provide for soil samplings beneath the slab and the which <br /> the County is requiring pursuant to their latest letter. <br /> I again commend the recommendations provided for in the analysis by Weston, <br /> Inc. as likely to be the least expensive in terms of cost and time. Stone <br /> Bros. would request that as the work plans are submitted, and the studies <br /> proceed, that the reports include presentation of drawings, plat plans etc. , <br /> drawn to scale to determine the exact location of the contamination, and the <br /> location of the underground tanks prior to their removal. This should also <br /> include the location of all piping, etc. related to the underground storage <br /> tanks. <br />