Laserfiche WebLink
ORC-concrete briquets. ane exact magnitude of this vu+ vc•z PL-3 vu <br /> number would be affected by(1)the groundwater veloc- 14 <br /> ity, (2) the concentration of benzene and toluene, (3) 12 <br /> - <br /> the mass of benzene and toluene degraded, and (4) the i ro <br /> degree of saturation and mixing within the screen. - e <br /> D.O. concentrations within the ORC-concrete well ° e <br /> 0 <br /> screen (OCL-2) were as high as 19 mg/L initially 2 <br /> (Day 4). Figure 7a shows that D.O. later stabilized to o t <br /> 8 to 9 mg/L (Day 18 to Day 38). These concentrations <br /> are approximately 24 to 58 percent of the maximum 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 <br /> expected D.O. (33 mg/L). Given the low sampling DISTANCE FROM SOURCE(m) <br /> frequency during the initial phases of the experiment, <br /> it is possible that D.O. may have been greater before 3600 vu•r vL•: PL-3 PL-4�.... Day i <br /> the B/T arrived at the well screen or during the acclima- 3000 - Day 2 <br /> tion of the native microorganisms to the B/T(i.e.,before '"4600 - <br /> significant biotransformation occurred). D.O. concen- W z000 �- Dayz <br /> trations in this line were also high at the points downgra- = 1600 �- Day 3 <br /> dient of the well screen containing ORC-concrete W f0e0 -a— Day: <br /> briquets: 9 to 15 mg/L at OCL-3, and 6 to 9 mg/L at m 600 Days <br /> OCL-4.Thus, even when there were significant oxygen o *- Day 2 <br /> sinks present in the ground water (i.e., BIT), the ORC 0.0 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.0 <br /> concrete released enough oxygen to generate an oxygen DISTANCE FROM SOURCE(m) <br /> plume that migrated at least 1 in from the well screen. <br /> This latter possibility is supported by the monitoring 3600 vc-' ve-z PL-3 vc� <br /> results from Day 68,37 days after B/T/NO3/Br injection 3000 <br /> ceased. On this day, D.O. was found to be 45.6 mg/L �2600 <br /> within the screen(OCL-2),consistent with oxygen solu- w 2aoo <br /> bility at 7 C(58 mg/L),and 4.9 mg/L 0.5 in downgradient W 1600 <br /> (OCL-4). The D.O. for Day 68 within the screen is also o 1000 <br /> fairly close to the expected D.O. (during the zeroth 600 <br /> order release phase) in the absence of an oxygen sink 0 <br /> (55 mg/L).These data illustrate that the ORC-concrete 0.0 0.6 1.0 t.s- 2.0 <br /> briquets were capable of producing and sustaining very DISTANCE FROM SOURCE(m) <br /> elevated concentrations of D.O. for at least 10 weeks Figure 8. Concentration of la)D.O., (b)benzene, and(c)tolu- <br /> after the ORC briquets were placed in the ground. ene along the Pencil Line. <br /> Figures 7b and 7c present the benzene and toluene <br /> data,respectively, along the ORC-Concrete Line. Both water flow paths were changing somewhat over th <br /> figures show relatively uniform and high concentrations course of the experiment,perhaps due to time and are: <br /> of B/T on Day 18,indicating that extensive biodegrada- variations in percolation of snowmelt. <br /> tion had not occurred. After this date, Figures 7b and Pencil Line <br /> 7c indicate that B/T concentrations decreased signifi- The D.O.concentration in ground water flowing pa <br /> cantly, in many cases to below the detection limit at the pencils can be estimated making the same assum <br /> OCL-2 and at other points further downgradient of the tions that were made for the ORC-Concrete Line. F( <br /> oxygen source. the pure powder, however, the oxygen release rates a. <br /> Figures 7b and 7c also indicate that B/T concentra- approximately 1.6 mg of 02 per day per gram of OR <br /> tions at OCL4 increased over time after about Day 34, for the first four days and 0.4 mg of 02 per day p <br /> rising to fairly high values by Day 39. However, the gram of ORC for the next 150 days.Thus,the expecte <br /> D.O. values at OCL-4 remained steady through Day 36 D.O. concentrations in ground water were appro) <br /> at about 8 mg/L, then apparently dropped by Day 38 mately 27 mg/L for the first four days and 6.8 mg/L f <br /> to 1.5 mg/L. Unfortunately, due to equipment failure, the remainder of the experiment.These lower values we <br /> it was not possible to measure D.O. on Day 39. On due to the smaller mass of ORC present in the pent <br /> Day 68, the D.O. in OCL4 remained low (0.2 mg/L). when compared to the mass of ORC present in tl <br /> Note, however, that the high B/T concentrations briquets. Given the estimated D.O. demand discuss( <br /> observed at OCL-4 were not detected in prior sampling above for the B/T concentrations used in the experimer <br /> of upgradient monitoring points. This suggests that the the D.O. in the vicinity and downgradient of the penc <br /> B/T detected at OCL-4 on the later dates did not flow should have been approximately 11 mg/L initially, b <br /> through the ORC-concrete well screen or by sampling would be expected to drop below the detection limit aft <br /> point OCL-3. The low observed D.O. would also be four days or so. <br /> consistent with this hypothesis. It is probable that, Figure 8a shows that initial D.O. levels immediate <br /> despite our efforts to minimize such effects, the ground downgradient of the pencils (PL-2), were greater the <br /> 126 a WINTER 1994 GWMR <br />