My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1985-1997
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
5400
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522692
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1985-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2020 2:47:19 PM
Creation date
4/2/2020 2:16:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1985-1997
RECORD_ID
PR0522692
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0015465
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER MONTGOMERY WARDS AUTO SRV CTR
STREET_NUMBER
5400
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
10227008
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
5400 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
401
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
R <br /> J . H . KLEINFELDER & ASSOCIATES <br /> CEOTECHNICALCONSULTANTS • MATERIALS TESTINC <br /> LAND & WATER RESOURCES <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION <br /> 9795 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE,SUITE D <br /> SACRAMENTO,CALIFORNIA 95827 <br /> (916)366-1701 <br /> April 1 , 1986 <br /> File : W- 2004-1 <br /> Ms. Laurie Cotulla <br /> Sanitarian <br /> San Joaquin Local Health District <br /> 1601 East Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, California <br /> Subject : WELL PERMIT FOR UNOCAL <br /> 5605 PACIFIC <br /> STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA <br /> Dear Laurie: <br /> We have forwarded the well permit conditions granted for the <br /> second phase of investigation at the Unocal Station at 5605 <br /> Pacific Ave. , in Stockton, California to Mr . Paul Yamamoto of <br /> Unocal . Although we fully intend to comply with the conditions <br /> of the permit, I have several comments which are intended to <br /> clarify those conditions: <br /> • Our rationale for screening only five feet above the <br /> encountered water table is based on installation of the <br /> well during the highest water level period of the year; <br /> however if the County desires screening ten foot above <br /> the encountered water table, we do not see any technical <br /> constraints to this condition. The only exception to <br /> this design requirement would be in situations where the <br /> first aquifer is found to be under confined conditions. <br /> Screening above the water table in such cases could <br /> result in cross contamination and therfore such practices <br /> are not followed by our firm. If the County will still <br /> require us to screen above the water table under such <br /> conditions, we would require a waiver of liability from <br /> the County. <br /> 1 <br /> ADD n � <br /> ENVIn,:,;t; IAL HEALTH <br /> FERMIT/SERVICES <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.