My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2001-CURRENT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
5400
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522692
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2001-CURRENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2020 3:01:51 PM
Creation date
4/2/2020 2:25:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2001-CURRENT
RECORD_ID
PR0522692
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0015465
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER MONTGOMERY WARDS AUTO SRV CTR
STREET_NUMBER
5400
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
10227008
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
5400 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
701
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 2 <br /> Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:19 PM <br /> To: 'Josh Ewert' <br /> Subject: RE: 5400 and 5606 Pacific Ave VEW wells <br /> Josh, "MA <br /> I found bene [ac3s for VEW-1 to VEW-13. at least they qualify now for "of known construction"... <br /> if you really want to use gw data to support vadose well status, then 1998 data in your list <br /> indicates many wells do not qualify for PG (pressure grout). <br /> do you have an isocon drawing for CDCs at this site in soil and gw? <br /> I interpret '7N an area of known or suspected contamination"to be within the isocon inside the <br /> zero line. <br /> you prove to me that the wells you're proposing for PG are OUT of the iscon for CDCs, and I <br /> will be more open to allowing PG. <br /> from what i see in the charts you sent in, VEW-2 thru 5 do NOT qualify for PG due to elevated <br /> gw data, the last from 1998. <br /> prove to me each well you're proposing to pressure grout: <br /> 1- has current lab data to support ND or <br /> 2- had initial installation data to support ND and <br /> 3- is of KNOWN construction and <br /> 4-is NOT in an area of known or suspected contamination. <br /> when it comes to 'remediation' wells, I'm under the opinion they were installed there DUE to <br /> contamination at one time. Unless you can prove a VADOSE well is NOT in vadose <br /> contamination by providing recent confirmation soil borings/samples, I will assume it is STILL <br /> in the area of contamination. <br /> as a reminder, nested wells installed with, for example, a 10-inch auger, must have a larger <br /> auger used to clear the original borehole per our well ordinance. Experience has shown a 15" <br /> auger centered on the deep casing must be used to completely radius across the original <br /> center of the hole and chew up the grout, bentonite, and sand on the other side of the original <br /> borehole. Plan on drilling to TD +1 foot for a sucessful well removal. <br /> mike <br /> From: Josh Ewert [mailto:ewert@geoconinc.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 20115:40 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: 5400 and 5606 Pacific Ave VEW wells <br /> 8/17/2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.