My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2001-CURRENT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
5400
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522692
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2001-CURRENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2020 3:01:51 PM
Creation date
4/2/2020 2:25:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2001-CURRENT
RECORD_ID
PR0522692
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0015465
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER MONTGOMERY WARDS AUTO SRV CTR
STREET_NUMBER
5400
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
10227008
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
5400 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
701
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vapor Well Installation 5400-5 Pacific Ave., Stockton, San Joaqui Pagel of 2 <br /> Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From: Johnston, Jennifer[Jennifer.Johnston@aecom.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 12:54 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Vapor Well Installation 5400-5606 Pacific Ave., Stockton, San Joaquin Co. <br /> For SV-1, at the time of the work plan preparation, I wasn't sure if we were going to need an encroachment permit <br /> to access SV-1. The well is on private property, and we have now determined that we can access it from behind <br /> the bank building, so we don't need an encroachment permit. <br /> For these wells, I don't know how long "a while" might be to you, but could be up to a year, depending on the <br /> data. At a minimum, we plan to sample these wells now and again in the fall. I would prefer to address well <br /> abandonment methodology at the time of the destruction permit, if that is alright. If all goes well this year, I am <br /> hoping we can start closing all the wells associated with this site soon. If that is the case, we would submit <br /> applications to destroy multiple wells at a time with an uniform approach specified for each well on the parcel. <br /> Jennifer Johnston, PE <br /> Senior Project Manager <br /> Environment <br /> D 916.361.6415 (internal extension 264.6415) <br /> jennifer.johnston@aecom.corn <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 11:45 AM <br /> To: Johnston, Jennifer <br /> Subject: RE: Vapor Well Installation 5400-5606 Pacific Ave., Stockton, San Joaquin Co. <br /> I got a chance today to work on the plan. <br /> looks ok, mostly. <br /> I couldn't find abandonment procedures. did I just miss them, or are they NOT in <br /> the plan? They are really NOT required now since the wells will be cement grouted <br /> and boxes set. Like any well (MW, VW, GWE, ) we typically don't need to know <br /> destruction plans up front. But vapor wells are unique, since they are so shallow, <br /> tiny, and differently constructed than 'real' wells. Typically, they come out when the <br /> data supports no further need to sample. <br /> you can address the abandonment issue now, or when you submit the destruction <br /> permit applications later. <br /> issuing the installation permits now for work on 5-13-2010 shouldn't be a problem <br /> once I'm clear about SV-1. (see next item) <br /> the WP mentioned "City of Stockton agencies.." why the City? you putting SV-1 <br /> in the City right of way? you need a traffic plan? I'll need this handled before I <br /> issue. If all wells are on private, NON-City property, your applications are ok. <br /> as for destruction after these wells are not needed anymore, each parcel needs an <br /> application, an approved method/materials plan, and a $60 fee per before they <br /> come out... <br /> 5/4/2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.