Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. James L. Barton <br /> October 19, 2007 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Robinhood Drive and screened from 45 to 65 feet bgs, has a similar.monitoring history with 10 consecutive <br /> non-detect events(January 2007 to October 2004). The last detection of dissolved petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons in MW-17 occurred in the July 2004 monitoring event. The analytical data have established <br /> that the"B"zone, in the vicinity of the former MW-15 and MW-17, is no longer impacted by petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons. Thus, ENSR proposed a well screened across the water table as appropriate for replacing <br /> MW-15. The CVWB recommendation of 28 to 43 feet is valid based on the water level fluctuation range, <br /> and ENSR concurs with the proposed well screen of 28 to 43 feet. <br /> Comment No.2 <br /> The Workplan does not include labeled cross sectional views of the well construction and the lithological <br /> sequence to be monitored. Please submit two cross sections, a dimensionally labeled well detail, and a <br /> lithology of the monitored zone,with the revised Workplan. <br /> Response No.2 <br /> Figure 2 shows the locations of the requested cross-sections presented in Figures 3 and 4. Correlation <br /> of the soil types encountered in prior soil borings suggest that the screen of MWA 5R will be located within <br /> fine-grained materials, specifically silt to sandy silt between roughly 5 to 45 feet bgs, with the possibility of <br /> encountering clay at depths greater than approximately 38 feet bgs. <br /> Figure 5 depicts the proposed construction of MW-15R, as requested. The total well depth to 43 feet and <br /> placement of well screen from 28 to 43 feet bgs is shown on the well construction figure. <br /> Comment No. 3 <br /> The Workplan includes Attachment A, Field Methods and Procedures, which states that the borings will be <br /> hand augered from surface to 8 feet bgs, and then drilled with an 8-inch diameter HSA to total depth. The <br /> Workplan Attachment narrative varies from the Workplan text on page 2, which specifies using an air <br /> knife from surface to 8 feet bgs and a 6.5-inch HSA to the total depth of 40 feet. <br /> Note that the air knife or hand augering techniques are acceptable for starting the boring. However, the <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department and I recommend the use of an 8-inch diameter <br /> HSA for the remainder of the boring, due to the high potential for bridging of the filter pack or bentonite <br /> seal when 2-inch wells are constructed inside the smaller diameter(6.5-inch OD, 3.25-inch ID) HSA at <br /> depths greater than 25 feet bgs. Likewise, removing 40 feet of 6.5-inch HSA to construct the well in the <br /> open boring might result in a collapsed boring,which would necessitate re-drilling with a larger diameter <br /> auger. Please include the dimensions of the air knife and specify in the text, the use of an 8-inch diameter <br /> HSA (per Attachment A)in the revised Workplan. <br /> Response No.3 <br /> The reference to 6.5-inch OD hollow stem auger for the drilling is incorrect, and the Workplan text should <br /> have stated the use of 8-inch diameter hollow stem auger, consistent with Attachment A. ENSR will direct <br /> 01231-154 ENSR I AECOM <br />