My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
5400
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522692
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2020 2:36:03 PM
Creation date
4/2/2020 2:28:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0522692
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0015465
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER MONTGOMERY WARDS AUTO SRV CTR
STREET_NUMBER
5400
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
10227008
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
5400 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fmr. Unocal . - 2 - 24 January 2008 <br /> Fmr. Montgomery Wards <br /> 5400-5606 Pacific St., Stockton <br /> • Submit a tentative schedule with dates for the proposed fieldwork and reports, so that 1 <br /> may input the proposed work into Geo Tracker as milestones to be completed. <br /> • Add Regional Board staff to the list of recipients for the well installation activities report. <br /> Appendix 8, Section 4.0 Schedule currently lists only the California Department of <br /> Water Resources and the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> (SJCEHD) as recipients of that report. All reports are to be submitted in paper copy to <br /> this office, as well as electronically to GeoTracker (Appendix 8 Section 3.6). <br /> • Give the SJCEHD and myself at least 3 working days notice for start of fieldwork. <br /> The Addendum memorandum provides an adequate explanation of the criteria evaluated by <br /> ENSR to determine that the AS/SVE needs a major redesign, and shows that wells of the <br /> existing AS/SVE treatment system were not operating correctly or may not be connected to <br /> the system. The Addendum also addresses my prior concerns and provides the requested <br /> information for the Workplan. However, I have additional comments based on my review of <br /> the Addendum and the requirements of CAO No. 5-00-0707. <br /> Additional Comments: <br /> 1. The Addendum schedule lists permitting as an unknown for scheduling. The new <br /> AS/SVE system needs to comply with all current local building codes so that the <br /> City of Stockton permitting process does not get bogged down and delay <br /> implementation of the restarting of the AS/SVE treatment system. The CAO No. <br /> 5-00-0707, Order #12 states the Discharger must "...Obtain all necessary local and <br /> state permits prior to beginning work. Failure to apply for any permits in a timely <br /> manner, which result in missed compliance dates, constitutes a violation of this Order, <br /> unless permitted by the Executive Officer.° <br /> • Please contact the City of Stockton, explain to them what work has been <br /> proposed, and provide their response to us in writing concerning whether permits <br /> are needed for the upgrades and whether the increased air pressure in the <br /> reused AS system (existing lines) is acceptable to the City of Stockton. <br /> • As stated above, all extensions to the schedule must be requested in writing to <br /> the Regional Board Executive Officer, with a cc: to me. <br /> • All construction delays must be reported to Regional Board staff within 24 hours <br /> by voice mail or email (my contact information is listed below). <br /> 2. The Addendum states the specified operational pressure for the air compressor for the <br /> AS portion of the treatment system is 80 to 125 psi (pounds per square inch) at <br /> 110 CFM (standard cubic feet per minute). On Sheet 4, Piping and Fitting No. 10.8, the <br /> Workplan specifies a 100 psi test of the lines with no pressure loss for one hour. <br /> Considering pressure losses due to friction in the piping will reduce air pressure at the <br /> wells, does the design of the piping allow pressures exceeding 100 psi, or will the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.