Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. James Barton <br /> November 2, 2004 <br /> Page 2 <br /> treatment technologies to help control plume movement and achieve the ultimate goal of <br /> site closure. The anticipated completion date for the RSE is November 30, 2004. <br /> 2. Conduct a comparative analysis of the changes in contaminant concentrations and <br /> distribution and mass within the aquifer beneath the site. Temporal changes will be <br /> evaluated beginning with the start of active remediation in October 1999. Estimates of <br /> changes in contaminant mass and distribution will be evaluated in light of the original goals <br /> of the remedial system. Recent groundwater monitoring results indicate reductions in <br /> contaminant mass now that the air sparging system has been overhauled and restarted <br /> and the highest residual concentrations are in a localized area around MW-11. The <br /> anticipated completion date for the comparative analysis is November 30, 2004. <br /> 3. Install additional monitoring wells into the lower two water zones (Unit C and Unit D) to <br /> further define the vertical and lateral extent of contaminants in those units and the <br /> groundwater flow direction relative to the upper units. The work plan for the proposed wells <br /> (MW-31 and MW-32) is included in this document. Pending approvals from the site owner, <br /> RWQCB and San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (SJCEHD), well <br /> installation activities should begin prior to November 19, 2004. <br /> 4. Beginning in fourth quarter 2004, groundwater parameters related to intrinsic <br /> biodegradation, specifically, concentrations of nitrates and sulfates by EPA Method 300, <br /> iron (II) by Standard Method 3500 Fe D, manganese (II) by EPA Method 200.7, and <br /> methane EPA Method RK will be analyzed in wells MW-2, MW-4, MW-7, MW-8D, MW-11, <br /> MW-14, MW-16 and MW-27. Dissolved oxygen readings will also be collected from wells <br /> MW-2, MW-4, MW-7, MW-8D, MW-11, MW-14, MW-16, and MW-27. Selected wells were <br /> chosen due to there proximity to the axes approximating the plume centerline and along a <br /> transverse axes. The results will be plotted on radial redox diagrams as a visual aid in <br /> analyzing natural attenuation within the boundaries of and at the outer edges of the plume. <br /> These analyses will also be utilized in evaluating the appropriate response to fluctuating <br /> concentrations at the plume boundaries. <br /> 5. Depending on the results of the forthcoming Geochemical Evaluation (GE), conduct bench- <br /> scale and pilot-scale tests of in situ chemical oxidation using ozone. The studies will <br /> evaluate the potential for ozone to be used to effect in situ contaminant mass destruction <br /> without adverse impacts to the aquifer. Alternative oxidants may also be evaluated during <br /> the bench-scale study. The GE evaluation will be submitted to the RWCQB on or before <br /> November 15, 2004. During a conversation between Ben Heningburg and Jim Barton on <br /> October 15, 2004, Mr. Barton stated that, based on preliminary soil analytical results for <br /> chromium, a bench-scale study would be required. <br /> 6. Submit a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) or work plan that includes a feasibility study of <br /> alternative remedial technologies that may accelerate contaminant reductions and eventual <br /> site closure. Technologies will be evaluated for their ability to achieve remedial goals within <br /> an accelerated time frame at a minimal or reasonable cost. Also, the need for active control <br /> J:\Projects\06940\5098-293\FinalRReports\Work Plans\5098 Work Plan-SVE AS System.doc <br />