My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_SEMI ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING OCTOBER 2010
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
5400
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522692
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_SEMI ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING OCTOBER 2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2020 4:56:29 PM
Creation date
4/2/2020 2:40:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
SEMI ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING OCTOBER 2010
RECORD_ID
PR0522692
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0015465
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER MONTGOMERY WARDS AUTO SRV CTR
STREET_NUMBER
5400
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
10227008
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
5400 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
389
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Data Validation Checklist <br /> Project Location/Project Number: Stockton/Chevron#306620 <br /> Date sampled: August 27, 2010 <br /> Method(s): EPA 8015M for TPHg, 8260 full scan and 1,2 DCA, EDB <br /> Lab/Lab work order number: Lancaster/ 1210187 <br /> Place an"X" in the appropriate column. If the answer is "No", describe lab's corrective action. <br /> Crueria Yes No Comments <br /> Is COC included in lab report? X <br /> Were the samples properly preserved? X No indication otherwise <br /> Is laboratory narrative included in lab report? X <br /> Was the laboratory narrative free of any lab X <br /> errors/discrepancies? <br /> Were holding times met? X No indication otherwise <br /> ' Were samples received at the correct temperature X No indication otherwise <br /> (4t2°C)? <br /> Did laboratory analyze with methods specified on X <br /> COC? <br /> Were appropriate analyte detection limits achieved? X <br /> Were surrogate recoveries within allowable range? X <br /> ' Were the laboratory Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike X There was no recovery of 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether <br /> Duplicate (MS/MSD) results within the allowable (non-target compound), as indicated on pages 9, 10, <br /> range? 12, 13, 15, and 16 of the Quality Control Summary. <br /> 1 Recovery of methylene chloride was elevated, as <br /> indicated on page 15 of the Quality Control <br /> Summary. <br /> ' Were the Laboratory Control Spike/Laboratory X Recovery of 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether(non-target <br /> Control Spike Duplicate(LCS/LCSD)results within compound)was outside the low end of the allowable <br /> the allowable range? limits, as indicated on page 5 of the Quality Control <br /> Summary. <br /> Blanks <br /> ' Lab blanks: Did lab blanks have non-detect X <br /> results? <br /> • Field blanks: Did trip blanks have non-detect X <br /> results? <br /> • Field blanks: Did rinsate blanks have non-detect X <br /> ' results? <br /> Duplicates <br /> 1 • Lab dups: Did lab dups have results within X LCS/LCSD and MS/MSD dups. No lab dups for field <br /> allowable range? samples run. <br /> 1 • Field dups: Did field dups have results within X <br /> allowable range? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.