Laserfiche WebLink
' Corrective Action Plan <br /> Montgomery Ward Auto Service Center, Stockton, CA <br /> ■ Probability of Achieving Cleanup Goals (10) This criteria was assigned a weight <br />' of 10 because it is of prime importance to achieve cleanup goals <br /> ■ Ease of Implementation (5) This criteria was assigned a weight of 5 because <br />' although it is preferred to use a method relatively easy to implement, achieving the <br /> cleanup goal is more important <br /> ■ Space Availability (8) This criteria was assigned a weight of 8 because it is <br /> important to have the required aboveground space needed to implement a specific <br /> remedial alternative <br />' ■ Disruption to Facility Operations (4) This criteria was assigned a weight of 4 <br /> because although it is desirable not to have significant disruption to facility <br /> operations, that is not the main goal of the remediation project <br />' ■ Time of Completion (7) This criteria was assigned a weight of 7 because <br /> although the time required for achieving the specified cleanup goals is not crucial <br /> by itself, it is relatively important when considered in terms of the total costs over <br />' the length of time required <br /> ■ Cost of Implementation (8) This criteria was assigned a weight of 8 because the <br /> cost effectiveness of a specific remedial alternative is of prime importance <br /> ■ Corresponding Applicability (4) This criteria was assigned a weight of 4 because <br /> although it is desirable to use soil and ground water remedial techniques that work <br /> together, it is not a necessity or requirement <br /> For each remedial alternative evaluated, EAI then assigned a grade (0-10) against each of <br /> 1 the above criteria This grade, multiplied by the weight of the individual criteria would <br /> then yield a weighted score for that criteria as applicable to a specific remedial alternative <br /> The sum of the weighted scores for all the criteria for each remedial alternative will then <br />' provide a weighted score for that alternative that can be compared to other remedial <br /> alternatives <br />' 6.3 Soil Remediation Alternative Screening <br /> Soil remediation measures generally can be classified into in-situ and ex situ methods In- <br /> situ treatment methods include bioremediation/bioventing, vapor extraction, and soil <br /> washing, just to name a few Ex-situ methods include excavation and off-site disposal, and <br /> excavation and on-site treatment using various treatment methodologies <br /> Based on the information available to date, including the pilot study results, EAI <br /> considered the following options for remediating petroie m hydrocnrbon impacted soils at <br /> the Montgomery Ward Site <br /> e In-situ bioremediation <br /> ■ Ex-situ bioremediation <br /> ■ Ex-situ vapor cxu action <br /> ■ Excavation and off-site disposal <br /> ■ In-situ vapor extraction <br /> Project No 1232 - 12 - <br /> SAIL <br /> 12 -SAIL WORD 1232CAP <br />