Laserfiche WebLink
' QUARTERLY GROUND WATER MONITORING Site Code 2163 <br /> Montgomery Ward Auto Service Center <br /> 5400 Pacific Avenue,Stockton, CA <br />' Each water sample was sealed in four 40-milliliter volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials with <br /> Teflon septa lined lids The VOA vials were completely filled so that no head space existed <br /> between the sample and the lids The samples were labeled with the sample point identification, <br />' preservative added, if any, date, time and EAI project number, and immediately placed into an <br /> ice chest chilled using frozen blue and crushed Ice The samples were kept chilled until <br /> delivered to the laboratory for analytical testing All samples were logged on a chain of custody <br /> record form (see Appendix B) <br /> 23 SAMPLING EQUIPMENT CLEANING PROTOCOL <br />' The steel bailer (Equipment), used only to purge the wells prior to sampling, was steam cleaned <br /> between each event as part of the decontamination procedures <br />' 2 4 EFFLUENT HANDLING <br /> All effluent generated during purging, sampling and equipment decontamination activities N;as <br /> sealed in labeled 55-gallon drums The drums were stored on the Montgomery Ward site <br />' pending proper disposal <br /> 3.0 ANALYTICAL TESTING <br /> The samples were delivered for analytical testing to BC Analytical, a state certified hazardous <br /> waste testing laboratory (Certificate No 1353) The samples were tested for halogenated <br /> volatile organic compounds (HVOCs) using EPA Method 8010, benzene, toluene, xylenes and <br /> ethylbenzene (BTEX) using EPA Method 8020, and total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline <br />' (TPH-g) using modified EPA Method 8015 The results of the testing are shown on Table 2 and <br /> Figure 4 The laboratory reports are contained in Appendix C <br />' 4.0 DISCUSSION <br />' The current gauging data indicate that the ground water elevations in the wells have risen on <br /> average approximately three feet as compared to the previous quarter's measurements (see Table <br /> 1) Interpretation of the ground water elevation maps indicates that the predominant direction of <br />' ground water flow, at the time of measurement, was generally east-southeasterly (i e , <br /> approximately S60°E) at a hydraulic gradient of 0 0025 feet/feet (see Figures 2 and 3) This <br /> represents a change from the previous quarterly monitoring periods where the direction of <br />' ground water flow was reported to be southeasterly <br /> 5.0 FUTURE SITE ACTIVITIES <br /> The second quarter (April through June) ground water monitoring for the Site will be conducted <br /> in June 1995 <br /> 1 <br />' Project No 1232 2 ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT, INC <br />