My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
O
>
120 (STATE ROUTE 120)
>
17000
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0523467
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 4:01:10 PM
Creation date
4/2/2020 4:34:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0523467
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0007060
FACILITY_NAME
WINE GROUP, THE
STREET_NUMBER
17000
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 120
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
24506030
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17000 E HWY 120
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Modeling Guidelines Page 3 <br /> 10. Modeling reports should provide: <br /> a. All of the empirical data, including flow, chemical, and geometric data, used in the <br /> modeling effort, including an explanation of the quality of the data, the sources of the <br /> data, and how the data is appropriate for use in the modeling. If the data are too <br /> voluminous to provide in hard copy,provide hard copy summaries of the data and a <br /> detailed data electronically in an acceptable format. <br /> b. Model Performance Information <br /> 1. Calibration and validation analyses and results <br /> 2. Sensitivity analysis and results <br /> 3. Model uncertainty and how it was determined <br /> C. The range of model applicability,and how it was determined. Model predictions for <br /> regulatory use should be confined to within the calibrated and validated ranges of the <br /> model. <br /> d. Raw input and output results. If the data and results are too voluminous,provide hard <br /> copy summaries of input/output data and detailed examples of selected scenarios, with all <br /> data and results being. <br /> e. Interpretation of output results. Run the model for normal and critical conditions. Evaluate <br /> the output data under normal and critical conditions. Explain what you believe the model <br /> shows and how the results should impact the Regional Board's decision-making process. <br /> REFERENCES: <br /> Additional guidance on modeling studies may be found at the following web sites. <br /> Protocols for Water and Environmental Modeling, Bay-Delta Modeling Forum, January 2000, <br /> http://www.cwemf.org/Ptibs/Protocols2OOO-Ol.pdf <br /> Ground Water Modeling for Hydrogeologic Characterization: Guidance Manual for Ground Water <br /> Investigations. State of California Environmental Protection Agency, <br /> http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/sitecleanup/SMP—Groundwater—Modeling.pdf <br /> Department of Pesticide Regulation studies on fate and transport of pesticides in soil and surface and <br /> ground waters.http://www.edpr.ca.gov/docs/sw/protocol.htm <br /> Center for Exposure Assessment Modeling(CEAM): http://www.epa.gov/ceampubl/ <br /> Council for Regulatory Modeling (CREM): http://cfpub,epa.gov/crem/index.cfin <br /> Draft Guidance on the Development, Evaluation, and Application of Regulatory Environmental Models <br /> (US EPA),http://www.epa.gov/osp/crem/library/CREM%20Guidance%2ODraR`/*2012_03.pdf <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.