My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
O
>
120 (STATE ROUTE 120)
>
17000
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0523467
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 4:01:10 PM
Creation date
4/2/2020 4:34:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0523467
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0007060
FACILITY_NAME
WINE GROUP, THE
STREET_NUMBER
17000
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 120
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
24506030
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17000 E HWY 120
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CLEANUP AND ABATEMENT OR1kR NO. �./ 3 <br /> THE WINE GROUP,INC. <br /> FRANZIA WINERY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY DRAFT <br /> NOV ordered the preparation and submittal of a Groundwater Degradation Evaluation Report to <br /> ascertain whether or not the discharge from this facility is degrading groundwater. <br /> 18. On 29 December 2003, the Discharger submitted a report titled Preliminary Groundwater <br /> Evaluation Report for the Wine Group, Franzia Winery. The report concluded that there appears <br /> to be a correlation between the area where winery process wastewater is applied and elevated <br /> levels of constituents of concern in the groundwater downgradient of that area. The report also <br /> indicated that more information and further investigation was necessary in order to fully evaluate <br /> current conditions and to plan necessary improvements. The report provided a conceptual plan for <br /> conducting additional data collection and analysis, and for the preparation of a wastewater <br /> treatment system and management improvement plan. <br /> 19. Regional Board staff have completed a review of this report and concur with the report <br /> conclusions and the proposed conceptual plan. The tasks and timeline for task completion <br /> contained in this Order are generally consistent with those contained in the report. A C&A Order <br /> is appropriate to ensure that the Discharger completes the studies and proposes steps to prevent <br /> further groundwater degradation. <br /> REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS <br /> 20. As a result of the events and activities described in this Order, the Discharger has caused or <br /> permitted waste to be discharged in such a manner that it has created, and continues to threaten to <br /> create, a condition of pollution or nuisance and potential public health threat.. <br /> 21. The beneficial uses of the Stanislaus River from Goodwin Dam to the San Joaquin River are <br /> municipal and domestic supply; agricultural supply; industrial process supply; industrial service <br /> supply; hydropower generation; water contact recreation; non-contact recreation; warm freshwater <br /> habitat; cold freshwater habitat; migration of aquatic organisms; spawning, reproduction, and/or <br /> early development; and wildlife habitat. <br /> 22. The beneficial uses of the underlying groundwater are municipal and domestic supply, agricultural <br /> supply, industrial service supply, and industrial process supply. <br /> 23. Section 13304(a) of the California Water Code provides that: "Any person who has discharged or <br /> discharges waste into waters of this state in violation of any waste discharge requirements or other order or prohibition <br /> issued by a regional board or the state board,or who has caused or permitted,causes or permits, or threatens to cause <br /> or permit any waste to be discharged or deposited where it is,or probably will be,discharged into the water of the <br /> state, and creates,or threatens to create,a condition of pollution or nuisance,shall upon order of the regional board <br /> clean up the waste or abate the effects of the waste,or,in case of threatened pollution or nuisance, take other <br /> necessary remedial action,including but not limited to,overseeing cleanup and abatement efforts. Upon failure of any <br /> person to comply with the cleanup or abatement order,the Attorney General,at the request of the board,shall petition <br /> the superior court for that county for the issuance of an injunction requiring the person to comply with the order. In <br /> the suit,the court shall have jurisdiction to grant a prohibitory or mandatory injunction, either preliminary or <br /> permanent,as the facts may warrant. " <br /> 24. Section 13267(b) of the California Water Code states: " In conducting an investigation specified in <br /> subdivision(a),the regional board may require that any person who has discharged,discharges,or is suspected of <br /> having discharged or discharging, or who proposes to discharge waste within its region,or any citizen or domiciliary, <br /> or political agency or entity of this state who has discharged, discharges,or is suspected of having discharged or <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.