My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0524190
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2020 2:10:20 PM
Creation date
4/3/2020 1:50:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0524190
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0016241
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON REGIONAL WATER CONTROL FAC
STREET_NUMBER
2500
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16333003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2500 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
729
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REGIONAL BOARD RESPONSE SE(SWRCB/OCC FILE A-1524(A)) `'� <br /> -2- <br /> PETITION FOR REVIEW OF WASTE DISCHARG$REQUIREMENTS <br /> ORDER NO. R5-2002-0181 <br /> CITY OF STOCKTON AND SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PHASE I MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM <br /> SEWER SYSTEM <br /> the Stockton urbanized area. In addition to storm water runoff from the Stockton urbanized area, <br /> Calaveras River, Mosher Slough, and Walker Slough also at times receive storm water runoff from <br /> agricultural areas and agricultural return (tail water) upstream of the Stockton urbanized area. All of <br /> these water bodies discharge to the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and are tidal freshwater within <br /> the Stock-ton urbanized area with a one- to three-foot tide. In most areas of the Stockton urbanized area, <br /> dry weather flow and storm water runoff are pumped to sloughs/rivers. These drain westerly into the <br /> San Joaquin River, which runs along the western side of the Stockton urbanized area. The quality and <br /> quantity of these discharges vary considerably and are affected by hydrology, geology, land use, season, <br /> and sequence and duration of hydrologic events. <br /> The City of Stockton is defined as a medium municipality (population greater than 100,000 but less than <br /> 250,000) in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)40 CFR 122.26 (b)(7). As such,the City must <br /> obtain an NPDES municipal separate storm sewer(MS4) permit. The County of San Joaquin contains <br /> urbanized areas and areas of potential growth, which are enclosed within the limits of the City or <br /> surround the City. The urbanized areas of the County that are enclosed within the City and the urbanized <br /> areas which surround the City are subject to the permit requirements. Due to the proximity of the <br /> County's urbanized areas to the City, their physical interconnections to the City's storm sewer system, <br /> and the locations of their discharges relative to the City's system, the County is designated as part of the <br /> medium MS4 in accordance with 40 CFR 122.26(b)(7)(iii). <br /> REGIONAL BOARD PERMITTING ACTIVITY <br /> The Regional Board adopted renewed Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Order No. R5-2002-0181 <br /> (NPDES No. CAS083470) on 18 October 2002. By letter dated 23 October 2002, the Regional Board <br /> transmitted the adopted Orders to the City and all interested parties. <br /> Prior to issuance of the WDRs,the Petitioners were covered under the NPDES area-wide MS4 permit, <br /> Order No. 95-035, adopted on 24 February 1995. <br /> RESPONSE <br /> While challenging the WDRs on three main grounds,DeltaKeeper's petition identifies 16 issues of <br /> concern with the challenged WDRs and states that its arguments in support of these issues are set forth <br /> in its 26 August 2002 comments on the tentative WDRs. See A.R.,Item 13. The Regional Board <br /> believes that the Regional Board's responses to comments prepared in connection with the WDRs <br /> adequately address these issues.The relevant responses are included, without substantive change,in this <br /> response. In addition, the Regional Board's complete responses to DeltaKeepers comments,contained <br /> in the A.R.,Item 7, are incorporated herein. <br /> FIRST BASIS: THE WDRs CONTAIN NUMEROUS PERMIT FINDINGS THAT ARE ERRONEOUS <br /> AND UNSUPPORTED IN THE RECORD <br /> DeltaKeeper requests that the State Board direct the Regional Board to provide evidence in the <br /> record that supports Finding Nos.33 and 34; if the Regional Board cannot do so,DeltaKeeper <br /> requests that the State Board remand the WDRs to the Regional Board for re-issuance with the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.