Laserfiche WebLink
REGIONAL BOARD RESPOjj§E(SWRCB/OCC FILE A-1524(A)) -13- <br /> PETITION FOR REVIEW OF WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS <br /> ORDER NO.R5-2002-0181 <br /> CITY OF STOCKTON AND SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PHASE I MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM <br /> SEWER SYSTEM <br /> programs [55 Fed. Reg.47990,48037 (Nov. 16, 1990)]. Municipalities must address certain categories <br /> of"permissible"non-storm water discharges in their SWMP. According to USEPA, permits may <br /> contain conditions allowing the permittee to either"prohibit or otherwise control any of these types of <br /> discharges where appropriate."The WDRs are consistent with this requirement. Prohibition B.1 of the <br /> WDRs state that the Permittees shall "effectively prohibit all types of non-storm water discharges into its <br /> municipal storm sewer systems" with some exceptions. Prohibition B.2 sets forth the categories of non- <br /> storm water discharges that are permissible. The WDRs further provide that any discharges within these <br /> permissible categories are prohibited unless they are appropriately controlled (Prohibition B.3). Thus, <br /> the CWA does not require a flat prohibition on non-storm water discharges, and the WDRs "effectively <br /> prohibit" such discharges in a manner and with a process that is consistent with the CWA and the <br /> USEPA's interpretation of the Act. <br /> FIFTEENTH BASIS: THE WDRs' NEW DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARE INCONSISTENT <br /> WITH THE PROHIBITION ON PERMITTING NEW SOURCES AND NEW DISCHARGES OF <br /> POLLUTANTS ALREADY IMPAIRING A WATER BODY <br /> DeltaKeeper requests that the State Board remand the WDRs to the Regional Board to prohibit <br /> the permitting of new sources and new discharges of pollutants already impairing water bodies <br /> (see Comment No.2(f)(6),A.R.,Item 13) <br /> DeltaKeeper incompletely cites the definition of a new source. Under the Clean Water Act, "new <br /> sources" means "[A]ny building, structure, facility, or installation from which there is or may be a <br /> `discharge of pollutants,' the construction of which commenced: (a) After promulgation of standards of <br /> performance under section 306 of CWA which are applicable to such source, or(b) After proposal of <br /> standards of performance in accordance with section 306 of CWA which are applicable to such source, <br /> but only if the standards are promulgated in accordance with section 306 within 120 days of their <br /> proposal" (40 CFR 122.2; see also 33 U.S.C. § 1316(a)(2)). Clean Water Act Section 306 governs the <br /> development of national standards of performance for certain categories of sources. (33 U.S.C. § 1316) <br /> As such, Congress tailored Section 306 to certain narrow sectors. The national standards of performance <br /> appear as effluent guidelines in CFR; title 40, chapter 1, subchapter N (commencing with part 400). The <br /> national performance standards must be applied to"new sources" that are to be issued an NPDES <br /> permit. (33 U.S.0 § 1316(b)(1)(B)). There are no new source performance standards that apply to storm <br /> water discharges. <br /> Additionally, the WDRs are consistent, as they must be, with the precedential provisions of State Board <br /> Order WQ 2000-11 regarding SUSMPs. <br /> SIXTEENTH BASIS: THE WDRs IMPROPERLY DELEGATE AUTHORITY TO THE EXECUTIVE <br /> OFFICER THAT IS RESERVED FOR THE REGIONAL BOARD <br /> DeltaKeeper requests that the State Board remand the WDRs to the Regional Board to amend <br /> applicable provisions to limit any administrative approvals or modifications to the list contained <br /> in 40 CFR§ 122.63 (see Comment No. 2(g),A.R.,Item 13) <br /> The WDRs do not impermissibly delegate to the Executive Officer the ability to issue or modify waste <br /> discharge requirements. DeltaKeeper essentially raises concerns with three aspects of the WDRs;the <br />