Laserfiche WebLink
• reflect whether the effluent limitation of 0.1 µg/1 is indeed an interim limit, and, if appropriate, <br /> must adopt a final effluent limitation for diazinon. <br /> 6. In all other respects, the petition is dismissed. <br /> IV. ORDER <br /> IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for the reasons discussed above, those portions <br /> of Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. R5-2002-0083 is remanded to the Regional Board <br /> for further proceedings consistent with this Order. Pursuant to its terns, the stay is dissolved at <br /> this time. <br /> CERTIFICATION <br /> The undersigned, Clerk to the Board, does hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true, and <br /> correct copy of an order duly and regularly adopted at a meeting of the State Water Resources <br /> Control Board held on March 19, 2003. <br /> AYE: Arthur G. Bagget, Jr. <br /> Peter S. Silva <br /> Richard Katz <br /> NO: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAIN: Gary M. Carlton <br /> am en Marche <br /> Clerk to the Board <br /> 7. <br />