My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0524190
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2020 2:10:20 PM
Creation date
4/3/2020 1:50:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0524190
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0016241
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON REGIONAL WATER CONTROL FAC
STREET_NUMBER
2500
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16333003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2500 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
729
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
%M01 Sold <br /> City of Stockton and County of San Joaquin Page 17 <br /> NPDES Permit CAS0083470 <br /> Response to Comments <br /> 3. Comment: See comment titled"Inclusion of Inappropriate Sections...," County Comment Letter <br /> The County states: "The City of Stockton—San Joaquin County Tentative Permit includes a <br /> mandate to control pollutants from fire fighting flows. San Joaquin County has not found this to be <br /> the case in any other MS4 permit in the State of California. All recent permits exempt emergency <br /> fire fighting flows and recognize that life and property protection take precedence over pollution <br /> prevention." <br /> Response: See the response to the City's Comment 11. <br /> 4. Comment: "Approval of the Storm Water Management Plan,"County Comment Letter <br /> The County states: "The Tentative Order provides for the approval of the Storm Water <br /> Management Plan (SWMP)by the Board rather than the Executive Officer, as was the case in prior <br /> permits. This requirement is burdensome and makes a simple modification of the SWMP a major <br /> effort by both the Regional Board and the permittees. Many conditions in the Tentative Order are <br /> what has previously been part of the SWMP. The SWMP is meant to be a fluid document that can <br /> readily be amended to correct unforseen problems, adjust program schedules to match field <br /> conditions, and revise requirements to fit new circumstances. This issue is directly related to <br /> increasing program flexibility to allow the program to match actual rather than perceived needs and <br /> conditions. Approval of the SWMP and any subsequent revisions by the Executive Officer would <br /> streamline the approval process and result in an improvement in the maintenance of an up to date <br /> Storm Water Management Plan." <br /> Response: See the response to the City's Comment 12. <br /> 5. Comment: "Delegation of State General Permits," County Comment Letter <br /> The County states: "The provisions of the Tentative Permit delegate[s] the State's responsibility for <br /> inspection and enforcement of the State General Permits for Industry and Construction to the <br /> permittees. The State has no authority to require the permittees to assume the State's regulatory <br /> responsibilities for these programs. NPDES Regulations for Storm Water Discharges, 55 Fed. REg. <br /> 47990,48052 (11/16/90), states that the `EPA(or the NPDES state) cannot abrogate its <br /> responsibilities under the Clean Water Act to implement the NPDES permit program by relying on <br /> pollution control programs that are outside of the NPDES program.' The tentative Permit should <br /> clearly define the powers and roles of the State and the permittees in implementation of the General <br /> Permits." <br /> Response: See response to the City's Comment 4. <br /> 6. Comment: "Financial Implications of the Tentative Permit," County Comment Letter <br /> The County states: Section D-16 of the Tentative Order states that `Each Permittee shall secure the <br /> resources necessary to meet the requirements of this Order . The Water Resources Control <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.