Laserfiche WebLink
City of Stockton and County of San Joaquin Page 26 <br /> NPDES Permit CAS0083470 <br /> Response to Comments <br /> In today's fiscal climate with a projected $23 billion State deficit, the County is expecting severe <br /> cuts in State funding of existing programs.Depending on the State's final budget, the County is <br /> estimating a 15% to 18% across the board spending reduction, which may include layoffs. To ask <br /> for additional funding from the general fund is against County policy for special districts. <br /> Based on recent State projections the RWQCB and all other state agencies will likely be impacted. <br /> by the State deficit and may need to delay or revise work programs to account for funding <br /> deficiencies (estimated 20%reduction). The County's situation is worse in that, in lean years the <br /> State has historically enhanced its revenues by reducing subventions and other funding of County <br /> programs. The County's limited taxing authority further impairs the ability to replace or increase <br /> needed revenues. <br /> Response: Federal NPDES regulation 40 CFR 122.26(d)(2)(vi)provides that: "[The Copermittee <br /> must submit] for each fiscal year to be covered by the permit, a fiscal analysis of the necessary <br /> capital and operation and maintenance expenditures necessary to accomplish the activities of the <br /> programs under paragraphs (d)(2)(iii) and(iv) of this section. Such analysis shall include a <br /> description of the source of funds that are proposed to meet the necessary expenditures, including <br /> legal restrictions on the use of such funds. Further, California Water Code section 13377 provides <br /> that the Regional Boards shall issue waste discharge requirements which apply and ensure <br /> compliance with all applicable provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. § <br /> 1251 et seq.), as amended, also known as the federal Clean Water Act(CWA). Section <br /> 402(p)(3)(B)(iii) of the CWA requires municipalities to implement "controls to reduce the discharge <br /> of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable, including management practices, control <br /> techniques and system, design and engineering methods, and such other provisions as the <br /> Administrator or the State determines appropriate for the control of such poluutants." The Regional <br /> Board's responsibility is to translate this section of the CWA into the form of waste discharge <br /> requirements. Therefore, the Regional Board has the authority to require specified programs to be <br /> implemented by the municipalities to carry out CWA requirements. <br /> DeltaKeeper Comments and Regional Board Response <br /> 1. Comment: Receiving Waters Are Already Seriously Degraded, Have Little Or No Dilution Capacity <br /> And Experience Multiple-Dosings. <br /> Stockton storm water discharges pose a substantially greater threat to the environment than storm <br /> water discharges from upstream cities. Local urban waterways lie within the tidal prism and are <br /> subject to frequent periods of reverse flows that provide little or no dilution. Furthermore,the State <br /> and Federal Project pumps can cause reverse flows in the San Joaquin River when the Old River <br /> barriers are not installed. <br /> Regional Board staff have analyzed these tidal effects and found that below a net San Joaquin River <br /> flow of 3000 cfs, flow reversals can cause multiple-dosings of discharged pollutants (i.e.,pollutants <br /> flow downstream from the discharge point and subsequently flow upstream past the point of <br /> discharge and then back downstream and again upstream). Fact Sheet, City of Stockton NPDES <br /> Permit, 8.5, April 2002. These multiple dosings can occur many times over extended periods of <br />