My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0524190
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2020 2:10:20 PM
Creation date
4/3/2020 1:50:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0524190
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0016241
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON REGIONAL WATER CONTROL FAC
STREET_NUMBER
2500
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16333003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2500 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
729
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Stockton and County of San Joaquin Page 67 <br /> NPDES Permit CAS0083470 <br /> Response to Comments <br /> loading; Irrigation water is an identified source of pesticide,nutrient and pathogen loading; <br /> Individual Residential Car Washing is an identified source of cumulative loading of detergents and <br /> oil,without specific enforceable BMPs; Lawn Watering is an identified source of pesticide,nutrient <br /> and pathogen loading; Street Wash Water is a source of many pollutants (The LA Regional Board <br /> prohibited discharge of street wash water to storm drains because they found them to be sources of <br /> pollutants. <br /> Response: The word"significant'has been removed from applicable texts to comport with 40 CFR <br /> 122.26(d)(2)(iv)(B)(1). <br /> 29. Comment: (DK Comment 4(c))Discharge Prohibitions B(3) for Non-Storm water Discharges. The <br /> word significant is not in the regulations and must be eliminated. The word significant only <br /> applies to firefighting discharges. B(3)(b) should be eliminated because non-storm water <br /> discharges must be eliminated. The MEP standard does not apply to non-storm water discharges. <br /> For such discharges the CWA establishes a flat prohibition. Section 402(p)(3)(B)(ii)mandates that <br /> "[p]ermits for discharge from the municipal storm sewers shall include a requirement to effectively <br /> prohibit non-storm water discharges into the storm sewers..." 33 U.S.C. § 1342�p)(3)(B). <br /> Response: The proposed language is consistent with 402(p)(3)(B)(iii). Prohibition B.3(b)provides <br /> the opportunity for the Permittees to install structural BMPs to eliminate or reduce the discharge of <br /> pollutants. In addition, Prohibition B.1 addresses the need for a de minimus permit if any of the <br /> referenced discharges are identified by the Permittees as a source of pollutants. <br /> 30. Comment: (DK Comment 4(d))Receiving Water Limitation C(1)(a) should be corrected to <br /> acknowledge that the Basin Plan contains a warm water spawning dissolved oxygen limit of 7 mg/l. <br /> Response: The warm water-spawning limit for dissolved oxygen of seven mg/1 only applies to <br /> certain stretches of the Delta. It is therefore inappropriate to cite this limit in C.1(a).. <br /> 31. Comment: (DK Comment 5(a)) SWMP Legal Authority, 6(d): states that"[t]he legal authority must, <br /> at a minimum, authorize the Permittees to: Control the discharge of spills, dumping, or disposal of <br /> material other than storm water to its MS4s." For such discharges the CWA establishes a flat <br /> prohibition. Section 402(p)(3)(B)(ii)mandates that"[p]errnits for discharge from the municipal <br /> storm sewers shall include a requirement to effectively prohibit non-storm water discharges into the <br /> storm sewers..." 33 U.S.C. § 1342(p)(3)(B). The language should be changed from control to <br /> prohibit. <br /> Response: "Control'has been changed to "Prohibit' in Provision D.6(d). <br /> 32. Comment: (DK Comment 5(b)) SWMP Legal Authority 7 should have the following sentence <br /> added: "Failure to follow the progressive enforcement schedule or, otherwise, effectively enforce <br /> the ordinance will be considered a violation of this permit." Stockton has frequently failed to <br /> escalate enforcement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.