My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0524190
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2020 2:10:20 PM
Creation date
4/3/2020 1:50:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0524190
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0016241
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON REGIONAL WATER CONTROL FAC
STREET_NUMBER
2500
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16333003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2500 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
729
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REGIONAL BOARD RESPONSE(SARCB/OCC FILE.A-1483) -21- <br /> PETITION FOR REVIEW OF WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS <br /> ORDER NOS. R5-2002-0083 AND R5-2002-0084 <br /> CITY OF STOCKTON REGIONAL WASTEWATER CONTROL FACILITY <br /> SIXTH BASIS: DAILY MAXIMUM EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS <br /> Stockton requests that the State Board direct the RWQCB to delete all the interim and final daily <br /> maximum effluent limitations. <br /> This request is based on new information that was not brought forward during the public comment <br /> period and should be excluded from the record before the State Board. Notwithstanding, the Regional <br /> Board provides the following response. 40 CFR 122.45(d)(2)requires weekly average and monthly <br /> average effluent limitations for publicly owned treatment works (POTWs). However, EPA recommends <br /> the implementation of maximum daily limitations (MDL) for toxic pollutants. EPA provides the <br /> rationale for this recommendation on page 96 of the TSD, "...EPA recommends establishing an MDL (or <br /> a maximum test result for chronic toxicity)for toxic pollutants and pollutant parameters in water quality <br /> permitting. This is appropriate for at least two reasons. First, the basis for the 7-day average for <br /> POTPs derives from the secondary treatment requirements. This basis is not related to the need for <br /> assuring achievement of water quality standards. Second, a 7-day average, which could comprise up to <br /> seven or more daily samples, could average out peak toxic concentrations and therefore the discharge's <br /> potential for causing acute toxic effects would be missed. A MDL, which is measured by a grab sample, <br /> would be toxicologically protective of potential acute toxicity impacts." Turbidity and coliform are not <br /> toxic pollutants,however, the MDLs are required to meet the Title 22 reclamation requirements, as <br /> recommended by DHS for the protection of public health. <br /> SEVENTH BASIS: MASS LIMITS <br /> Stockton requests that the State Board direct the RWQCB to delete the mass limits for mercury, <br /> lindane, endrin aldehyde, and DDT <br /> Mercury: The SIP states, "For bioaccumulative priority pollutants for which the receiving water <br /> has been included on the CWA Section 303(d) list, the RWQCB should consider whether mass loading of <br /> the bioaccumulative pollutant(s)should be limited to representative, current levels pending TMDL <br /> development in order to implement the applicable water quality standard." Health advisories by the <br /> Department of Health Services remain in effect for human consumption of fish in the Delta, including <br /> the SJR at Stockton, due to excessive concentrations of mercury in fish flesh. These current warnings <br /> indicate that the receiving water has no assimilative capacity for mercury. Any increase of mercury in <br /> the RWCF discharge would violate the Basin Plan's narrative toxicity objective. Therefore, interim <br /> mass-based effluent limitations were adopted for mercury, limiting the discharge to representative, <br /> current levels pending TMDL development (see Table 11-6 of Order R5-2002-0083). <br /> It is recognized that the SIP recommendation to consider interim limitations at"representative, current <br /> levels"could effectively place a cap on future growth of the RWCF.service area. Therefore, Order <br /> R5-2002-0083 requires the development of an offset program,which could be used to offset mercury <br /> loads over and above the interim limitation. If a TMDL is established and the discharge mass load still <br /> exceeds that limitation, this program could be used to offset discharges over and above the TMDL. <br /> In this context the term"offset"refers to reductions in loadings of the pollutant to the Delta and SJR <br /> watershed achieved through the Discharger's actions from an appropriate source. This includes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.