My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0524190
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2020 2:10:20 PM
Creation date
4/3/2020 1:50:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0524190
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0016241
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON REGIONAL WATER CONTROL FAC
STREET_NUMBER
2500
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16333003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2500 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
729
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REGIONAL BOARD RESPONSE (SWRCB/OCC F1LE A-1483) -24- <br /> PETITION FOR REVIEW OF WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS <br /> ORDER NOS. R5-2002-0083 AND R5-2002-0084 <br /> CITY OF STOCKTON REGIONAL WASTEWATER CONTROL FACILITY <br /> reasonably required. The requirement to conduct a carcinogen impact study is consistent with section <br /> 13383. It is also consistent with Water Code section 13267. The Basin Plan at IV-18.00 states, <br /> "Pollutants which are carcinogens or which manifest their toxic effects on the same organ systems or <br /> through similar mechanisms will be considered to have potentially additive toxicity". The human <br /> carcinogens to be studied may exhibit additive toxicity, and need to be addressed together. In addition, <br /> the extent of the mixing zone for human carcinogens is based on the harmonic mean dilution rather than <br /> the chronic mixing zone, and is not assessed by any studies completed to date. In order to grant a <br /> dilution credit for human carcinogens, a mixing zone must be granted. The SIP requires that the size of <br /> the mixing zone be delineated. The requirement is not based on any new rulemaking. <br /> "115. The Permit includes a requirement to develop pollution prevention plans. (Provision G.6.) <br /> This requirement is unreasonable because it derives from lack of consideration of existing dilution, <br /> and is based on inaccurate conclusions regarding TDS." <br /> Regional Board's response concerning dilution is stated above in response to the First Basis for Review. <br /> Total Dissolved Solids: The southern one-third of the Delta is 303(d) listed as an impaired water <br /> body for total dissolved solids (TDS). The RWCF outfall is downstream of this impaired area, so the <br /> RWCF discharge will not impact this 303(d) listed area. There are no USEPA water quality criteria for <br /> protection of aquatic organisms for TDS. However, its presence in water can be growth limiting to <br /> certain agricultural crops and affects the taste of the water for human consumption. The secondary <br /> California maximum contaminant level (MCL) for TDS is 500 mg/1 as a recommended level, 1000 mg/I <br /> as an upper level, and 1500 mg/1 as a short-term maximum. The recommended agricultural water quality <br /> goal for TDS is 450 mg/1 as a long-term average. <br /> The Discharger's report of waste discharge indicates an annual average TDS effluent concentration of <br /> 726 mg/l, a lowest monthly average of 638 mg/l, and a highest monthly average of 792 mg/l. These <br /> concentrations exceeded the applicable objectives. Limited TDS data collected at receiving water <br /> sample location Rl from May 1994 through June 1998 indicate that the concentration of TDS in the <br /> receiving water ranged from 77 mg/i to 630 mg/1 and averaged 313 mg/1 in 13 sampling events. These <br /> receiving water monitoring data indicate there is somewhat limited receiving water assimilative capacity <br /> for TDS, and at times the receiving water exceeds these levels established as long-term averages. As <br /> water exported from the Delta by the State Water Project is, in part,mixed with Colorado River water to <br /> provide municipal water supply with an acceptable TDS, any increase in salt concentration effectively <br /> reduces the available water supply in Southern California. Some of the significant sources of TDS in the <br /> effluent include discharges from industrial users, and the Discharger's practice of acidifying the plant <br /> effluent to prevent ammonia toxicity in flow through bioassays. <br /> Pollution prevention is necessary to assure the receiving water achieves the water quality objectives for <br /> TDS. Therefore,pursuant to Water Code section 13263.3,Provision G.6 of Order R5-2002-0083 <br /> requires the Discharger to develop a pollution prevention plan to limit or reduce the amount of TDS in <br /> the effluent. The study will include assessment of the sources of TDS to the RWCF including sources to <br /> the collection system and chemical usage at the RWCF (e.g. acidification of effluent to meet lower acute <br /> ammonia toxicity). The study shall also include proposal and cost estimates of limiting significant TDS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.