Laserfiche WebLink
RESPONSE TO WRITTEN COMMENTS -36- <br /> City Of Stockton - Regional Wastewater Control Facility <br /> NPDES No. CA0079138 <br /> 26 April 2002 Board Meeting <br /> ammonia. EPA concurs with the methodology staff used in the selection of pH values both for the <br /> determination of reasonable potential and for the establishment of WQBELs. <br /> We share your concern regarding the effects of the plant's high ammonia concentrations in driving <br /> down dissolved oxygen in the receiving water. High nitrates may also contribute to low DO values. <br /> EPA encourages a close review of the study required under Provision G.14. <br /> The time schedule of less than 5 years to meet WQBELs for CTR constituents is consistent with the <br /> SIP. The time schedule for WQBELs established from a new interpretation of the Basin Plan narrative <br /> criteria is consistent with the Basin Plan allowance for compliance schedules. <br /> EPA is also pleased to see that a pollution prevention program and offset program are required to be <br /> developed for those pollutants which may be contributing to water quality impairment, but for which <br /> reduction at the source or through offsets is more economical than through additional treatment (TDS, <br /> pesticides, mercury, etc.). Finally, the receiving water monitoring program, and the addition of <br /> monitoring station R-2A will be of tremendous benefit in determining water quality impacts associated <br /> with the discharge. <br /> RWQCB Response: Comments are noted. <br /> NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE COMMENTS <br /> NMFS Comments: The NMFS submits this letter in support of the tentative order. This facility <br /> apparently needs an upgrade in treatment technology to protect beneficial uses, including the <br /> protection of salmonid fish species listed as threatened or endangered. The requirements will result in <br /> significant improvements to water quality in the Stockton area of the San Joaquin River. Eliminating <br /> impacts caused by elevated ammonia should be particularly beneficial to these fish. We are pleased to <br /> see the Board acknowledge that the nitrification process may increase nitrate concentrationsin the <br /> discharge, and that denitrification should be examined. The requirement to treat the effluent to Title <br /> 22 tertiary standards should also benefit the fish species we manage. The loading of metals and <br /> organic contaminants that are sorbed to particles in the discharge will be reduced. <br /> Efforts to upgrade treatment processes at municipal wastewater treatment plants throughout the <br /> Central Valley Region have not gone unnoticed by the NMFS, and we anticipate that this process will <br /> make rapid improvements to water quality conditions. Thank you for your continued efforts in <br /> protecting and improving water quality and restoring endangered and threatened salmonids. <br /> RWQCB Response: Comments noted. <br />