My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0524190
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2020 2:03:19 PM
Creation date
4/3/2020 1:57:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0524190
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0016241
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON REGIONAL WATER CONTROL FAC
STREET_NUMBER
2500
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16333003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2500 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Thanks for all your assistance, <br /> Steve <br /> Stephen Gittings <br /> Deputy Director/Wastewater <br /> City of Stockton <br /> 2500 Navy Drive <br /> Stockton CA 95206-1191 <br /> Phone: 209 937 8781 <br /> Cell: 209 403 0685 <br /> email:steve.gittings@ci.stockton.ca.us <br /> Notice: This transmission is for the sole use of the intended <br /> recipients (s) and may contain information that is confidential and/or <br /> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this <br /> transmission and any attachments and notify the sender by return email <br /> immediately. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution <br /> is prohibited. <br /> >>> "Gayleen Perreira" <GPerreira@waterboards.ca.gov> 7/9/2009 9:54 AM <br /> Good morning Mark and Steve, <br /> Earlier, the City requested that I review its report, "Work' Plan and <br /> O.me Schedule for Analyses of Background Groundwater Quality" even <br /> though the permit does not require our approval. I finally have a bit <br /> of time (Manteca permit went out for review and I'm waiting for <br /> additional info from Lodi before submitting my comments and potential- <br /> approval on their request) to review and comment on this report. But <br /> before I spend the time (I 've got a LOT of work setting on my desk) , I <br /> wanted to be sure that it's still necessary. Have you already <br /> proceeded with the workplan, or are you still waiting for my comments. <br /> Thanks for tolerating me. I'm just trying to work smarter. Gayleen <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.