Laserfiche WebLink
California gional Water Quality Con I Board <br /> Central Valley Region •..✓ ; <br /> Karl E. Longley,Scl), P.E.,Chair _ .- <br /> Linda S. Adams 11020 Sui:Cenicr Urixe X200. Rancho Cordova, California 95676-61 14 Arnold <br /> Secreturl lu' Phonc(916)464-3291 • FAX(916)464-4645 Schwarzenegger <br /> P-171.1romnewul Imp: \\x\\\.\\aterboards.ca.go\ centrakalle\ Gm-ernor <br /> l'ruleC6017 REC"NOVEDD <br /> 20 April 2009 <br /> APR 2 3 2009 <br /> Mr. Mark Adams, Trustee, <br /> Lincoln Center Environmental Remediation Trust ENVIRONMENT HEALTH <br /> 137 Park Place PERMITj'SERVrC�S <br /> Point Richmond. CA 94801 <br /> DOCUMENT REVIEW, CHEVRON #9-6171, 6633 PACIFIC AVENUE, STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN <br /> COUNTY, (LUSTIS CASE# 390054) <br /> I reviewed the Re. Response to Chevron Environmental Management Company (Chevron) 'No Further <br /> Action Required (NFAR) Request' Chevron Service station 9-6171 (Site), 6633 Pacific Avenue, <br /> Stockton. California, August 27; 2007 (Comments); received by email on 13 April 2009 from Lincoln <br /> Center Environmental Remediation Trust (Trust) prior to the end of the 45-day public participation period <br /> for Site closure. The Comments were revised from comments submitted 13 November 2007 to the <br /> Chevron NFAR report. The Comments state closure is unjustified at this time due to an incomplete <br /> Chevron evaluation and remediation of the petroleum hydrocarbons plume at the Site. Currently the <br /> Trust operates three extraction wells installed at the Site for partial containment and remediation of their <br /> chlorinated solvent (drycleaners' spill) groundwater plume, which impacts the Site and several <br /> surrounding properties. Additional Trust extraction wells operate offsite. <br /> Comment #1 states the submerged well screens for monitoring wells (MW-2 through 5, and M1/\1-7), with <br /> the fact that monitoring wells MW-6, MW-9, MW-11 D, MS-1, MS-8 were not represented in a 2007 <br /> NFAR cross-section, justifies reinstalling new water table wells to "...assess hydrocarbons impacts... . <br /> The Trust also requests reinstalling MW-8 due to the low purge volume generated by the well and <br /> methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) reported at 220 micrograms per Liter (ug/L) in 2005. MW-8 is 20' from <br /> Trust extraction well GEW-007A. The Trust acknowledges that the Site downgradient monitoring wells <br /> have never been impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons, allegedly due to the operation of the Trust <br /> groundwater pump and treatment system. <br /> Response. The following existing well's: onsite: MW-8. MW-9, and MW-10; offsite MW-12. MW-13 and <br /> Mw-1-d, screen-intprserli:_.the water table and vyere_monitored.untiL_July 2008,when monitoring,was <br /> suspended by this agency Wells MW-2 through MW-5 and MW-7 were monitored with the water table <br /> within the well screens from 1990 until 1996, and their sample results reported low levels of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons with the exception of total petroleum hydrocarbon as gasoline (TPHg), which was <br /> subsequently discovered to be comprised of chlorinated solvents and not gasoline constituents. While <br /> these well screens from 7' to 14' feet below the water table until 2008, water table wells MW-8 through <br /> MW-10 are screened across the water table and are adequately spaced around the Site to monitor the <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon plume. Moreover, the data from MW-8 through MW-10 showed either no <br /> impacts or a declining trend. MW-8 MTBE sample results declined from a historic high of 1,200 ug/L in <br /> 2001 to 11 ug/L in July 2008, regardless of low purge volumes and occasional dry well conditions. You <br /> have not demonstrated or supported that the data obtained during sampling is not representative of <br /> groundwater conditions. The petroleum hydrocarbon data show that groundwater plume has exhibited a <br /> stable declining trend necessary for a low risk closure. Therefore, the existing network of monitoring <br /> wells has adequately delineated and presented representative conditions of the petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> plume Additionally. the California Water Code Section 13267 (b) (1) states in part , The burden <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> ro x,� led l�:,t <br />