Laserfiche WebLink
+1 „ <br /> ATTACHMENT B (continued) <br /> FIELD AND LABORATORY PROCEDURES <br /> will be topped with locking caps The wellheads were contained in watertight well boxes, <br /> either traffic rated and flush mounted or in a "stove-pipe" arrangement The boring logs <br /> show the well construction details The wells were developed after completion The <br /> development procedure for the wells consisted of pumping or bailing water from the wells <br /> until the water is visibly clear, the wells goes dry, or until a maximum of ten casing volumes <br /> have been removed After development, water levels were allowed to recover Groundwater <br /> samples were then collected using a disposable teflon bailer, placed into appropriate EPA- <br /> approved containers, labeled, placed on ice, and transported to the laboratory accompanied <br /> by chain-of-custody documentation The well casings were surveyed to the nearest 0 01 feet <br /> in elevation to a known benchmark <br /> Organic Vapor Procedures <br /> Soil samples collected during drilling were analyzed in the field for ionizable organic <br /> compounds using an organic vapor meter (OVM) or a photo-ionization detector (PID) with a <br /> 10 2 eV lamp The test procedure will involve measuring approximately 30 grams from an <br /> undisturbed soil sample, placing this subsample in a ziplock type bag or in a clean glass far, <br /> and sealing the far with aluminum foil secured under a nng-type threaded lid The container <br /> will be warmed for approximately 20 minutes (in the sun), then the head-space within the <br /> container will be tested for total organic vapor, measured in parts per million as benzene <br /> (ppm, volume/volume) The instrument will be calibrated prior to dnIling using a 100-ppm <br /> Fsobutylene standard (in air) and a sensitivity factor of 55, which relates the photo-ionization <br /> potential of benzene to that of isobutylene at 100 ppm The results of the field-testing will be <br /> noted on the boring logs PID and FID readings are useful for indicating relative levels of <br /> contamination, but cannot be used to evaluate hydrocarbon levels with the confidence of <br /> laboratory analyses <br /> Laboratory Procedures <br /> Selected soil and groundwater samples collected were analyzed for the presence of total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons calculated as gasoline (TPHg), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, <br /> xylenes (BTEX), and fuel oxygenates (MtBE, EtBE, TBA, TAME, DIPE, 1,2-DCA, EDB <br /> Methanol, and ethanol) using EPA Method 8260 <br /> Soil Cuttings and Purge Water <br /> Soil cuttings generated during drilling operations were temporarily stored on plastic or in <br /> DOT-approved 55-gallon drums pending transport by the disposal contractor to an <br /> appropriate disposal or treatment facility Contaminated soil cuttings were removed by a <br /> California-certified disposal contractor to an appropriate disposal facility Water generated <br /> during steam cleaning and development of the new wells were temporarily stored in DOT- <br /> approved 55-gallon drums pending transport by the disposal contractor to an appropriate <br /> disposal or treatment facility <br />